00:01
hello out there across the planet this
00:05
is junior ll the Gnostic voice on the
00:08
internet talking to you once again and
00:11
inviting you to mythic Renea in action
00:16
that's the generic name or comprehensive
00:19
title I'm using for the talks that I'll
00:22
be uploading on internet following the
00:26
completion of the Gnostic investigation
00:28
of the Mandela effect just last month so
00:33
you'll hear me repeat that term myth a
00:35
free Nia in action at the beginning of
00:40
these talks from now on I'm recording on
00:43
the 29th no 28th of November 2017 and
00:50
I'm calling this talk our contact
00:53
dementia the AI robot Sophia is a fraud
01:00
so what I will attempt to do what I wish
01:05
to do in this talk is first of all give
01:08
you an orientation to what I mean by our
01:12
contact dementia and I'm going to
01:15
introduce a new acronym a DF regarding
01:21
everything that is our contact by the
01:24
Gnostic definition I'm going to stick
01:26
rigorously to the Gnostic perspective on
01:29
the archons and all things our contact
01:33
and once I've presented that orientation
01:37
then I will give you my fix my hit must
01:44
my opinion if you will on the highly
01:49
controversial and enormous ly hyped
01:51
subject of the AI robot Sophia who was
01:57
introduced just last month introduced to
02:00
the entire world
02:02
in connection with events in Saudi
02:04
Arabia so with that introduction I shall
02:08
begin now from the
02:12
view of my career as a Gnostic teacher
02:17
on the Internet the proper place to
02:21
begin would be in June or July thing
02:26
with July of the year 2002 just over 15
02:33
years ago and in that month around the
02:36
fourth of July think American
02:38
Independence Day many history org went
02:42
online and since that time coming
02:46
forward for 15 years that site has been
02:50
the principal source of Gnostic Intel
02:55
and Gnostic teaching regarding the truth
03:00
about the ancient mysteries on the
03:02
mystery schools and dedicated to their
03:06
recovery of the fallen goddess scenario
03:11
FTS that is to say the astronomical myth
03:15
of the goddess Sophia and at that time
03:21
my work was supported by a certain
03:25
foundation in the United States called
03:28
the Marian foundation and may our IOM
03:31
having nothing to do with Marian
03:34
apparitions of the Virgin Mary
03:36
it's simply named after a place in
03:38
Massachusetts now I recall clearly that
03:42
I was at the headquarters of the Marian
03:44
foundation or Marian Institute as it's
03:48
now called in November of 2001 right
03:53
after the 9/11 event I was there to
03:57
present a talk on Gnosticism and I
04:00
shared the stage with noted Gnostic
04:04
scholar from Princeton University Elaine
04:07
Pagels sometimes during the events of
04:11
the conference I was sitting in a little
04:13
alcove where people take tea and have a
04:16
little lunch with one of the sponsors at
04:22
the Marian Foundation who got me started
04:24
with the website
04:26
which I created for them and for their
04:30
purposes at that time that is to say I
04:35
created meta history org as an
04:37
instrument and organ of that foundation
04:40
at that time and I remember that
04:45
individual asking me well John are you
04:49
going to tell the world about the heart
04:52
cards now this was six years before five
04:59
years before not in his image came out
05:01
and yet I had enough Gnostic material on
05:07
hand I had enough research behind me to
05:12
be able to present the theme of the
05:16
archons to the world at large and I did
05:19
so in the summer of 2002 when the site
05:23
went online I want to emphasize to you
05:30
that the Intel life presented on the
05:34
archons is unique and unparalleled on
05:37
the Internet
05:38
even though the term Archon and
05:41
occasionally the adjective our contact
05:44
but less so has become extremely
05:48
familiar and widely used on the Internet
05:52
even though it has as they say quote
05:56
gone viral and quote over these 15 years
06:02
I remain the individual or I should say
06:08
I remain the individual who introduced
06:14
the term and I stand rigorously by the
06:17
initial conditions that I applied when I
06:21
did so now I'm going to remind you of
06:24
what these initial conditions are the
06:27
word icon comes out of the Greek
06:30
Hellenic period of Alexander the Great
06:33
and Cleopatra and the Christian Gospels
06:37
if you will and it simply meant governor
06:41
or ruler of the time so that was the
06:43
Archon of a certain region of the Roman
06:47
Empire was the governor but in the
06:50
gnostic scenario coming out of the
06:52
mystery schools the tellus day or the
06:58
illumined summons of that movement had a
07:02
concept of the archons which came from
07:07
their deep perception of the origin of
07:11
the solar systemin of humanity itself
07:13
and according to that scenario which is
07:17
extensively presented on meta history
07:19
org as well as in my book the archons
07:23
are an extraterrestrial cyborg
07:28
species they actually are a species of
07:32
their own a certain kind of entity which
07:37
has a certain physical presence and
07:39
physical form and they inhabit the solar
07:44
system at large this is according to the
07:46
perspective of the gnostic intel they do
07:50
not inhabit the earth and they cannot in
07:52
inhabit the earth they cannot due to the
07:56
fact that the conditions of the
07:58
biosphere and the high presence of
08:00
oxygen and other factors are inimical to
08:05
their own makeup which is basically a
08:08
silica and Mercury organism an insect
08:15
like or locust like organism now the
08:18
archons can shape-shift and they can
08:20
take various forms in their own world
08:24
what makes the archons really dangerous
08:26
for Humanity is that they can remote
08:32
view the human race which they've been
08:34
doing for countless eons of time and
08:37
they can project their presence into the
08:40
human mind and even into the atmosphere
08:42
of the earth by the use of a faculty
08:45
they process called
08:47
howl HAL Hall is a Coptic word meaning
08:52
simulation mimesis or virtual reality so
08:57
the archons can and do appear in various
09:00
forms in the human world and they even
09:03
include upon the biosphere through this
09:07
Faculty of bar context emulation or hal
09:11
and so there have been many encounters
09:15
with these entities throughout time and
09:18
the naga hamadi materials from egypt
09:23
discovered in 1945 in egypt give some
09:28
explicit and vivid accounts of direct
09:31
encounters with the archons and they
09:33
also described how to deal with these
09:35
malevolent and intrusive entities so the
09:40
archons are an extraterrestrial species
09:42
that arose prior to the formation of the
09:47
earth and prior to the appearance of the
09:49
human species on earth that's why
09:53
they're called archons because the name
09:56
comes from a Greek a Greek root rki
10:01
meaning first or from the beginning or
10:05
before everything else the archons are
10:08
an anomaly in the solar system they are
10:11
due to an anomaly introduced by the a on
10:15
Sofia herself so you can say yes if you
10:18
want to put it in that language it's the
10:20
fault of the planetary mother Sophia
10:23
that the archons are entangled in the
10:28
divine experiment on earth and facing
10:31
the archons as such as they are a
10:36
predatory extraterrestrial species is
10:39
one of the great challenges of this
10:43
experiment now our content is an
10:49
adjective that can be applied to
10:52
everything that derives from the archons
10:56
Archon and our contact you now have the
10:59
Gnostic background you have the rigorous
11:01
Gnostic Intel when I speak about the
11:04
archons
11:05
I stay faithful to this Intel and I
11:10
follow the narrative I follow the Sophie
11:13
annek vision story because that story is
11:17
the necessary narrative frame for you to
11:22
work in your imagination with this Intel
11:25
if you do not work within that frame
11:29
with this Intel you will not be able to
11:32
handle the Intel correctly so many
11:35
people are talking about the archons
11:37
today do not handle the material
11:40
correctly and they speculate and they
11:43
extrapolate upon the concept of arc on
11:46
which the Gnostic teacher introduced
11:50
into conventional discourse fifteen
11:54
years ago so you can listen to them if
11:56
you like but I warn you that when you
11:59
listen to other people talk about the
12:01
archons if they are not doing so in the
12:05
framework of the Gnostic narrative of
12:09
Sofia then they are bound to speak
12:12
incorrectly and bound to fabulet to
12:16
indulge in make-believe in fantasy and
12:21
to present you with misleading
12:23
information clear enough now the subject
12:30
of the archons which scholars like
12:34
Elaine Pagels
12:36
tend to downplay or avoid entirely for
12:41
instance in her book the Gnostic Gospels
12:43
which broke the NAG Hammadi material out
12:47
into the world at large introduced it to
12:51
the mainstream in that book gnostic
12:54
gospels which is wrongly titled you will
12:57
find in the index no reference to the
12:59
archons nevertheless the material
13:02
concerning the Archon constitutes at
13:05
least one fifth and probably a little
13:08
bit more of the total amount of material
13:11
in the Nagamani writings and related
13:13
writings about the Gnostics as for
13:16
instance found in the polemics of the
13:18
church
13:19
fathers so the not archons are a big
13:22
deal and there the subject is one of
13:27
continual and ongoing interest and
13:30
excitement and challenge among those of
13:34
you out there who like myself live in
13:39
the sophiana narrative that is the myth
13:42
by which we lived it is the myth to
13:45
guide the species now I'm not going to
13:49
elaborate on all the ways in which the
13:53
archons operate but let me give you a
13:55
quick summary and bring the description
13:58
down to the subject of IT and AI
14:05
robotics the fembot sophia and all that
14:12
jazz primarily the archons operate upon
14:18
the human mind well for one thing they
14:20
do a lot of remote viewing whole teams
14:24
of them stare at the back of your head
14:27
and they remote view and they try to
14:31
capture the human animal in various ways
14:35
I've explained this in talks I gave I
14:38
think in the year 2000 by remote viewing
14:42
they tried to capture the limbic system
14:45
of the human animal they transmit
14:48
shortwave frequency similar to those
14:50
that come out of the towers that carry
14:58
telecommunication signals for iPhones
15:01
and other technology the archons are not
15:05
alive they do not breathe for instance
15:07
on our contact entity does not breathe
15:11
it operates on an electrical field
15:16
grounded in a mercury base and sealed in
15:23
a number of silicon formats which are
15:27
equivalent to the Intel chips of a
15:30
computer
15:32
I'm talking now principally about the
15:34
embryonic form of the archons described
15:39
in the Gnostic texts as resembling the
15:43
aborted Finas fetus excuse me the
15:46
aborted fetus who had in Coptic the
15:51
aborted fetus really means the premature
15:54
fetus why did the Gnostics choose this
15:59
bizarre image of a prematurely born
16:02
fetus to describe the whitley strieber
16:05
form of the archons well because it
16:09
resembles that bug-eyed entity with
16:15
spindly limbs prematurely born fetus who
16:20
Hey in Coptic would have both large head
16:26
correct and a spindly body correct and
16:30
don't forget to add this this is the
16:33
most important point in that brilliant
16:37
description coming from the Gnostic
16:41
masters of the mysteries the aborted
16:46
fetus is born dead so by using that
16:51
analogy using that metaphoric
16:55
description of the archons which is an
16:58
accurate description of one of their
17:00
prominent forms the Gnostic masters were
17:05
bringing your attention to the very
17:07
great fact that the archons are not
17:11
alive in the way that we are alive they
17:16
are not a I or al which is artificial
17:21
life there is no such thing as
17:23
artificial life they are an artificial
17:28
form organism that appears to be
17:33
lifelike as a robot appears to be
17:35
lifelike but they are not invested with
17:38
life in the same manner as the human
17:40
animal and other animals living in the
17:43
biosphere of the planet
17:45
so where was I yeah the archons have
17:50
this particular form that is the form of
17:52
the the hive entity and then they have a
17:56
drug conic draconic or reptilian form
18:03
which is the form taken by the overlords
18:07
of the Archon tech hive or Horde of
18:12
which there are billions and billions
18:15
one of the principal ways they operate
18:18
upon the human animal oh yeah apart from
18:20
steering at the back of your head they
18:22
also use flicker feeding flicker into
18:28
your eyes and inducing a trance state so
18:31
as I said once they get you coming and
18:33
going if they can't get you from behind
18:35
the head which produces depression and
18:39
confusion in the human animal when they
18:41
manage to penetrate into the limbic
18:43
system then they'll put you in a
18:45
narcotic trance through the use of
18:47
flicker and that of course is
18:50
demonstrated that technique of course is
18:53
demonstrated by that wonderful invention
18:55
known as the television in that
18:58
television the archons are actually tell
19:01
a viewing you but bear in mind that they
19:05
did not invent the television human
19:08
beings invented the television it just
19:10
happens to be a device that is extremely
19:12
compatible to the archons and assists
19:16
them in their attempted takeover of our
19:19
species now I'll return to this point
19:22
several times in this talk the
19:24
difference between IT informational
19:28
technology and AI artificial
19:33
intelligence which are products of human
19:37
invention and the et mind itself which
19:42
is extra human non and non human they're
19:46
not the same but at a certain point they
19:48
interface one of the main ways that the
19:53
archons have intruded upon our species
19:56
is through channeling
19:57
and they have introduced into the mind
20:00
of the human species certain concepts of
20:04
religious ideology which are very
20:07
destructive to our way of life primarily
20:11
the ideology of the master race and of
20:15
racial supremacy the ideology of
20:19
salvation the ideology of an apocalyptic
20:22
annihilation of the human species all
20:25
these religious ideologies prominent in
20:28
the Abrahamic religions Judaism
20:32
Christianity and Islam come from the
20:36
archons they have been suggested into
20:39
the human mind by the archons and in
20:43
fact back in the days of certain
20:47
theocrats and rulers in the Middle East
20:55
stemming from the time of Sargon of
20:58
Akkad
20:59
who was the first one I believe who was
21:02
named and historically verified and
21:03
coming down through that period of the
21:07
Middle Eastern theocracies you will find
21:11
the presence of the archons it is very
21:13
known fact very well known and well
21:15
established fact among scholars that
21:18
those theocratic kingdoms of the Middle
21:21
East in those kingdoms the ruler
21:26
governor or authority always had
21:29
advisors and handlers who were psychics
21:33
and channelers they were called roughly
21:36
the Chaldeans there were always two
21:38
called Ian called Ian is kind of a code
21:40
name for psychic channelers just as
21:46
President Ronald Reagan had an
21:49
astrologer who advised him in the matter
21:53
of his meetings with Gorbachev and may
21:57
have had psychics in the background
21:59
well these ancient middle-eastern rulers
22:02
always had psychics and some of these
22:03
psychics channeled the archons and
22:06
through that channeling they the archons
22:10
introduced
22:11
their alien mindset into the human mind
22:14
and it was taken on as if it were
22:18
something of the human mind which it is
22:21
not but part of the deception of the
22:24
archons is that they persuade you that
22:26
their way of thinking is actually yours
22:29
you see they cannot become what we are
22:32
and they cannot physically overtake the
22:35
human species but they can persuade us
22:39
and trick us into becoming more and more
22:41
like they are and they do that through
22:45
principally in one way through religious
22:48
ideology so the Anunnaki script which is
22:52
the slave species mean which is widely
22:56
discussed on the Internet often in
22:59
connection with the archons is actually
23:02
a result of a channeling from the
23:05
archons into the human mind if you go to
23:07
med history org and go to the Archon
23:10
files you will see that I have described
23:13
at length the various theories of our
23:18
contact incision and I have given the
23:22
core Gnostic material that explains this
23:25
type of intrusion through the
23:29
implantation of a religious ideology
23:32
which is actually alien and destructive
23:35
to our species and that religious
23:37
ideology today is recognized as the
23:40
Semitic tradition of Judaism which
23:45
informs both Christianity on the one
23:47
hand and Islam on the other this Semitic
23:51
religion of Judaism is a narcotic
23:54
implant in the human mind a foreign
23:57
installation as Carlos Castaneda would
24:01
have called it you know I was listening
24:04
recently to someone on the internet who
24:06
was talking about the weaponized use of
24:11
so-called migrants and refugees coming
24:16
into Europe and the use of these people
24:18
or largely Muslims
24:22
people of color from Africa in the
24:26
Middle East
24:27
alien races to the European land the use
24:33
of these people to displace the European
24:37
population and in fact are perpetrate an
24:40
act of genocide upon Europeans and in
24:42
the process of discussing this problem
24:45
the individual mentioned that it was
24:49
totally alien for a child in Sweden or a
24:55
child in Germany or or Spain or England
24:59
to be taught stories of the Bible
25:02
stories from the Old Testament such as
25:05
Abraham in the burning bush as if these
25:07
stories were part of the lineage of
25:12
those children because and and I can I
25:17
can know very much relate to that
25:19
because when I was a child growing up in
25:21
friendship Maine and I attended Sunday
25:23
school well there you have it I can even
25:27
remember the name of the Sunday school
25:29
teacher her name was Verena Simmons and
25:33
she used to present illustrations at her
25:37
child's level the level of a fairy tale
25:40
all of certain episodes that happened in
25:42
the Old Testament the parting of the Red
25:44
Sea Abraham and the burning bush the
25:49
writing of the Ten Commandments on Mount
25:52
Sinai as if these stories had anything
25:58
whatsoever to do with me and so the
26:02
commentator was pointing out that it's
26:06
ridiculous and dangerous for people in
26:10
the West and in Europe to take on these
26:14
stories that come from a semitic Judaic
26:20
background in the Middle East such
26:23
stories such tales have nothing to do
26:26
with the origins and way of life of
26:29
European people or people anywhere else
26:31
in the world in South America and
26:33
Polynesia
26:34
China but the point that he made was
26:38
still not complete enough my mind he
26:42
stated that the Semitic fairy tales of
26:45
Abraham Moses and so forth were foreign
26:49
to European countries and european
26:53
peoples well that's obvious isn't it
26:57
well I say to you I upped the ante I say
27:02
to you speaking from the Gnostic
27:04
perspective that those Semitic fairy
27:08
tales of religion which carry the Archon
27:13
tech ideology are not only alien to
27:18
Europe they're alien to the entire
27:20
planet they don't even belong on the
27:23
planet Semitic religious ideology of the
27:27
master race doesn't even belong on this
27:30
planet it doesn't belong in this
27:33
experiment it is an alien transplant now
27:37
those of you who followed my gnostic
27:39
investigation of the Mandela effect will
27:42
remember my analysis of the first super
27:46
cluster the Volkswagen Ford logo super
27:51
cluster and you will recall that I
27:55
decoded in that cluster a clear
27:57
reference to this problem the problem of
28:02
master race ideology and its attendant
28:06
program of genocide so you can see that
28:11
some of the themes and topics I'm
28:13
developing here in the first talk in
28:17
missile Freni
28:19
in action echo and repeat the material
28:25
of that investigation
28:26
so moving ahead moving ahead because I'm
28:29
still in the orientation to this talk
28:32
how else do the archons intrude upon the
28:36
human animal well through how which you
28:39
can translate as virtual reality you
28:41
know when people encounter these ETS
28:44
when they have enough et abduction it's
28:47
perience that is due to the projection
28:49
of virtual reality into the human mind
28:52
they do actually experience them but in
28:55
the manner of someone who would say wear
28:59
one of those helmets that are now
29:04
available supposedly you can put on a
29:08
helmet and you can stand in a booth with
29:11
skis on and ski gear and you can appear
29:15
to yourself through the virtual reality
29:19
technology that is operating through
29:21
this class get this helmet that you're
29:23
wearing
29:23
you can appear to be skiing on Mont
29:27
Blanc that's virtual reality well the
29:30
archons use that to perform these
29:33
abductions in to the extent that et
29:36
abductions are genuine and some of them
29:38
are some of them are not at all done by
29:41
the ETS so they use virtual reality they
29:49
use massive a massive assault of short
29:57
wave radiation pulses to attack the
30:02
human creature this is a fact it's also
30:05
a very great fact and I'm happy to
30:08
announce this to you that since
30:12
September of 2014 the human species has
30:16
been shielded from these microwave
30:19
assaults by the archons coming from
30:23
outside the solar system there is still
30:26
a problem with the microwave technology
30:28
on earth a great problem with that
30:32
microwave technology but as regards the
30:35
massive waves and blasts the continual
30:40
blast of shortwave radiation proceeding
30:43
from the archons in the external solar
30:46
system toward the earth that's over
30:51
that's finished the ionic mother herself
30:55
established a shield in September and
30:58
October of 2014 and you
31:01
can go and read about that shield
31:02
scientists actually detected it and they
31:04
were extremely baffled as to how it
31:07
could have suddenly appeared as if
31:09
overnight and due to that shield being
31:13
erected around the earth humanity at
31:17
large is now protected from the ongoing
31:20
onslaught of the archons but there is
31:24
still a problem of dealing with the
31:25
iconic factor in our midst the arc
31:28
arctic factor that human beings have
31:32
incorporated and internalized in
31:35
themselves is still a great problem and
31:39
that leads to the subject of our contact
31:42
dementia finally passing on to the third
31:46
aspect I'm outlining four aspects here
31:50
of our contact intrusion the third
31:52
aspect actually involves a virus or
31:57
viral infection I've pointed out many
32:02
times in my talks and writings and I
32:04
repeat this again as a matter of
32:07
imperative importance to those of you
32:09
who want to get this story straight the
32:12
archons never achieved a genetic hack
32:15
into the human genome but they did
32:18
achieve a neural hack into the human
32:20
brain and there are some human animals
32:24
walking around on this planet who carry
32:27
the ark antic neural infection in their
32:31
brains that are contact neural infection
32:35
inhabits the neural circuits in a manner
32:38
that conceals itself behind the chemical
32:44
l-dopa
32:45
so we're l-dopa is detected in the brain
32:49
of these infected individuals and not
32:51
all human animals are infected in this
32:53
way in fact a very very small faction of
32:57
them are where this neural infection
33:04
which is kind of like a mucoid sheathing
33:08
over the neural circuits occupy
33:14
the human brain it is veiled behind the
33:17
chemical l-dopa therefore it is very
33:19
difficult to detect
33:22
during the amine detox I mentioned this
33:25
our cottage infection and I said that I
33:28
would explain how it occurred which I'll
33:32
get around to probably in this new
33:34
series of talks finally we come to that
33:40
aspect of the arconti conclusion upon
33:43
the human species which relates really
33:46
closely to AI obviously how as virtual
33:50
reality relates closely to AI but I
33:57
invite you to consider the term a term
34:00
that is even more pertinent here and
34:05
that is the term mimetic mi m ET i see
34:13
now you'll note that the terminal medic
34:16
is nothing new and a big deal you've had
34:18
heard a million times haven't you but
34:21
you'll find if you pay attention that
34:25
the presumed masterminds of AI and AI t
34:30
such as the people at Hanson robotics
34:32
who created the fembot Sophia will use
34:37
this term memetics Elan musk will use
34:42
this term memetics he has a particular
34:46
spin on it and I'll get around to L on
34:49
musk you can be sure of that
34:53
so memetics means the science or
34:58
technique of simulation of mimicking
35:03
something actually the word
35:05
corresponding to memetics and the
35:08
Gnostic Intel that warns us about the
35:12
mimetics of the archons can be founded
35:17
in our Kumari writings on T MinMin a and
35:21
t i m-i m o n on t min mod
35:27
is actually a Greek term in ananka
35:30
mighty writings and it is characteristic
35:32
of the archons they are said to perform
35:34
on t min Mon which I've translated as
35:37
counter mimicry now what is counter
35:42
mimicry well it means very simply that
35:47
you mimic or imitate something but that
35:52
which is the imitation reverses the
35:57
purpose or meaning of that which is
36:00
imitated so hey I artificial
36:07
intelligence is counter mimicry on T
36:12
mamon of the archons how is that cell
36:16
because artificial intelligence mimics
36:21
or replicates living intelligence but
36:26
then it turns around and counteracts
36:29
living intelligence by representing
36:32
living intelligence as if it were not
36:36
alive AI is not alive yet it mimics the
36:41
intelligence that is alive that is
36:44
counter mimic great look at the robots
36:48
that are being created these days look
36:51
at the fembot sofia she is the vivid
36:57
representation of counter mimicry all of
37:02
her circuits all of her programs have
37:05
been created by mimesis applied in a
37:10
technological manner I'm not making that
37:13
claim the people who created and handled
37:16
her and handle her are making that claim
37:20
so she mimics or imitates a living human
37:26
being it the fembot but the fembot it is
37:32
not alive that is counter mimicry
37:37
counter mimicry is one of the
37:40
primary the fourth signature in my
37:43
little inventory here of the archons so
37:47
with that note at the 37 minute mark
37:52
I think I can say that my orientation is
37:56
complete and I can go directly to the
37:59
topic of this invention coming from the
38:07
company Hanson robotics the AI robot
38:13
Sophia my purpose in this talk in the
38:20
remaining half an hour is not to
38:24
convince you of anything I'm not just
38:28
going to shove my opinion in your face
38:30
and expect you to believe it but I warn
38:33
you that what I'm telling you is more
38:35
than just an opinion my intention is to
38:42
give you the basis to realize with
38:47
confidence with the confidence of your
38:49
own mind that the AI robot Sofia is a
38:56
complete fraud and it's my intention
39:02
that you would see through this fraud
39:05
and not be duped so I have a strong
39:12
personal motive here for my friends and
39:16
allies out there across the planet
39:18
those who still care and dare to listen
39:21
and that personal motive is I want you
39:26
to sober up and wise up and recognize
39:33
the fraud that is presented to you when
39:38
it is right before your eyes now let me
39:42
give you a short personal anecdote I
39:45
think I was about 10 or 11 years old
39:49
when we got our first television in
39:53
ketchup main there was a really big deal
39:55
there were three channels you know three
39:58
networks and it was a black-and-white TV
40:01
I can picture it very well so there I am
40:04
10 11 year-old child in the mid-1960s
40:08
watching television
40:09
what were the programs what were the
40:11
first programs that I saw well one of
40:14
them was I Love Lucy and of course how
40:18
wonderful it is that the I Love Lucy
40:20
theme shows up in the encoded material
40:23
in the Mandela effect linking of course
40:27
and interlocking with peanuts and Lucy
40:31
Van Pelt and Linus Van Pelt in the
40:37
cartoon series now additionally there
40:43
was another program that came on a
40:45
little bit later the Twilight Zone and
40:49
how many of the themes and and stories
40:53
and plots of The Twilight Zone coming
40:56
from Rod Serling have been realized
40:59
since that time so there was I Love Lucy
41:05
Twilight Zone and one of the other
41:08
earliest memories I have of watching
41:13
television was seeing a comedian named
41:17
Edgar Bergen and he was a man from a
41:24
Swedish ancestry actually there for a
41:28
euro-american of Swedish childhood
41:31
Swedish immigrants in the United States
41:33
and he was known for his act with a
41:37
dummy named Charlie McCarthy so
41:41
technically what Edgar Bergen did was to
41:46
perform
41:47
ventriloquism which means speaking from
41:55
the chest or speaking from the throat
41:58
without moving the mouth so we held on
42:01
his lap the dummy Charlie McCarthy and
42:05
he conversed with the dummy
42:06
so Edgar Bergen the man spoke and then
42:11
Charlie McCarthy responded and Edgar
42:14
Bergen controlled the head movements and
42:16
the mouth movements of the dummy with
42:18
his right hand and he projected his
42:21
voice into the dummy so it appeared as
42:24
if Charlie McCarthy was speaking when
42:27
you looked at it GU Bergen you couldn't
42:29
see his lips move because that is the
42:31
gift of ventriloquism to speak without
42:35
moving your lips and without revealing
42:39
that you are speaking
42:40
but obviously anyone who you know
42:45
observe this anyone who sits down and
42:48
watches this act he's going to know that
42:53
the ventriloquist Edgar Bergen is
42:58
speaking the words of the dummy Charlie
43:00
McCarthy now I have never seen a live
43:04
act of intrude with them but I was
43:06
certainly impressed and amused to by
43:09
this early instance that I saw on
43:11
television now just imagine anyone of
43:15
you sitting in an auditorium in a
43:19
theater watching on stage the act of a
43:25
ventriloquist this could be an extremely
43:28
accomplished ventriloquist so the human
43:32
real-life ventriloquist is sitting there
43:36
and on his or her lap or beside him
43:40
perhaps standing independently is the
43:43
dummy and a conversation ensues right
43:47
the ventriloquist says one thing the
43:50
dummy responds sometimes what the dummy
43:52
says is really funny Wow the dummy's
43:56
cracking jokes the dummy has a great
43:58
sense of humor it winks and it moves its
44:01
head in an animated and amusing way and
44:03
all that and so on and so forth but just
44:07
hold on a minute here what kind of
44:14
creature are you I'm asking you would
44:18
use
44:19
in the auditorium watching the spectacle
44:22
actually believe that the dummy was
44:27
speaking out of its own volition and
44:30
that it was producing spontaneously
44:36
everything that it was saying would you
44:39
actually believe that of course not
44:42
you would allow yourself to play along
44:46
with the amusing illusion that the dummy
44:50
is speaking but if you were to be
44:53
convinced that the dummy actually was
44:57
autonomous and could compose its own
45:01
sentences could comment and junk and
45:05
wink and move its face in certain
45:09
expressions if you were to convince
45:13
yourself that that was the case well you
45:18
would be slightly demented of course
45:23
it's an easy example isn't it who among
45:27
you who are hearing my words right now
45:29
would be fooled or would fool yourself
45:32
into thinking that a ventriloquist dummy
45:35
is actually speaking autonomously
45:40
nevertheless that is what you are being
45:44
invited to do with the AI fembot Sophia
45:50
now I want to be sure that I'm getting
45:55
across to you here am I making myself
46:00
clear
46:01
I'm making a claim here quite a large
46:06
claim the claim is that whoever is
46:12
presenting the AI thin BOTS named Sophia
46:17
to the world the people at Hanson
46:23
robotics and whoever is working with
46:27
them or whoever is behind them
46:30
the creators and handlers of Sofia maybe
46:37
they are I claim duping you they are
46:43
committing a massive act of fraud before
46:48
the eyes of the world they are passing
46:53
off this simulacrum this robotic
46:57
simulacrum designed to mimic a human
47:03
being in appearance and designed to
47:05
mimic the expressions language and
47:09
thought processes of a living human
47:12
being as if it were alive in its own
47:18
right as if it were a living intelligent
47:23
autonomous entity but it is not it is
47:28
not well let's just stop for a moment
47:31
because I want you to look very
47:33
carefully at what I'm saying and I want
47:37
you to get your minds around where I'm
47:42
coming from why am i saying this in on
47:45
what do i basis this view of this
47:50
phenomenon that has been created now
47:54
before the eyes of the world over the
47:57
last couple of months significantly as
48:01
some of you will certainly know if you
48:06
followed the Gnostic investigation of
48:07
the Mandela effect it is a remarkable
48:13
synchronistic or synchro mystical event
48:18
to see this fembot paraded before the
48:24
world at this very particular and exact
48:27
moment considering everything that I
48:30
said in the Mandela effect investigation
48:34
about the Aon Sophia
48:38
everything
48:39
I said about her autonomy the ioniq
48:44
mother has agency about her ability to
48:48
scan the human psyche to have an impact
48:55
upon human memory circuits to penetrate
49:01
into the subconscious and also to
49:05
penetrate through the CERN membrane into
49:08
the first attention of the human animal
49:11
her ability to hack the internet and to
49:15
manipulate content on the Internet
49:19
everything that I have said about the
49:22
Living planetary divinity of Sofia is
49:27
grotesquely and fraudulently mirrored in
49:31
the Sofia robot so it's not any accident
49:36
that they have brought out this entity
49:39
that they have brought this dummy upon
49:42
the stage of the world at this time now
49:46
I'd like to say that the conclusion that
49:51
you can draw from this message from this
49:55
talk is clear simple and straightforward
49:59
I'll tell you what the takeaway is in
50:02
case you were wondering the AI fembot
50:09
Sofia is a fraud perpetrated upon the
50:12
world to convince the world that the
50:17
state of AI of artificial intelligence
50:22
the technology of AI is far far more
50:26
advanced than it actually is
50:28
and far more advanced actually than it
50:33
ever can be
50:34
it can never be as far advanced as those
50:38
who put Sofia before the eyes of the
50:42
world would like the world to believe so
50:46
there is an intention there's an agenda
50:47
that comes with Sofia oh you
50:49
there is and there are several aspects
50:52
to that agenda and it's no accident that
50:55
she it was introduced in Saudi Arabia
51:02
simultaneous with the announcement of
51:04
the government of Saudi Arabia to
51:07
produce and and create this futuristic
51:11
city that runs on robotics and IT
51:14
technology neon it's no accident that
51:18
she is presented to the world as it as
51:22
it were the poster robot and spokes
51:27
robot speaking robot who stands for this
51:33
project the city of neon and who has
51:37
identified with it and who has been
51:39
given the status of citizenship by the
51:44
government of Saudi Arabia this is all
51:46
part of the scheme it's all part of the
51:48
agenda of the people behind Sofia and
51:52
it's all part of the fraud those who
51:58
invented her and who are handling her
52:00
and I'll get to the handling in a moment
52:03
get to the particulars of the handling
52:06
what the world at large to believe that
52:10
they have achieved a singularity in AI
52:15
now this term singularity gets thrown
52:18
around quite a bit one usage of it can
52:21
be found in the writings of reycarts
52:24
whale who is a transhumanist and a big
52:26
fan of AI and the and the merging of
52:30
human intelligence with artificial
52:32
intelligence or even the dissolution of
52:35
the human mind into the cyber our
52:40
contact mind but I'm not thinking of
52:44
that individual right now I'm thinking
52:47
more of the notion of singularity as it
52:52
has been associated in recent talk
52:55
October November 2017 recent talk recent
53:00
chatter cava
53:03
and interviews centered on the sofia
53:07
robot in this particular context
53:11
singularity means this it means the
53:15
event and the moment of the event when
53:20
AI overtakes the human intelligence that
53:23
created it
53:25
that is how singularity is being defined
53:28
in relation to the sofia robot that
53:36
simulacrum that android is said to
53:41
represent the police and demonstration
53:45
that AI technology has created a
53:49
human-like instrument that can actually
53:57
perform in such a way that its
54:00
intelligence exceeds the intelligence of
54:05
the human species and so the singularity
54:09
of November 2017 is that it is said to
54:16
be that and I say to you that such a
54:20
claim is entirely fraudulent AI can
54:26
never exceed the human intelligence that
54:29
created it it can never excel in the
54:32
purely human linguistic and intellectual
54:39
features of our species it can excel in
54:44
certain tasks we know this already a
54:46
computer can compile a list and sort
54:51
through a list and make an inventory
54:53
more rapidly and in some respects more
54:57
neatly and accurately and concisely than
54:59
a human being true but all the elements
55:02
of the inventory if it's an if it's a
55:05
book catalog of 50,000 books all of
55:09
those books have to be entered by human
55:12
hands into the database of the computer
55:15
and then
55:16
the program that is designed to organize
55:20
that material the titles the subjects
55:24
the authors and so forth of those 50,000
55:28
books the software that's going to
55:30
handle and manage and organize it also
55:33
has to be created by human beings it has
55:36
to come from the human mind once that
55:39
whole package is put together then you
55:42
can sit down in the keyboard and the IT
55:45
tool your computer will be able to make
55:49
comparisons and book searches and
55:51
calculations more rapidly and
55:54
effectively then a human being could do
55:57
but it can only do that because it's
55:59
already been set up to do that by human
56:01
beings what is being claimed about the
56:04
fembot Sophia is more than that the
56:08
claim is that she is autonomous that she
56:12
stands there on the stage and converses
56:14
in a Q&A; and makes jokes and makes snide
56:18
comments about well she won't destroy
56:22
humanity if you are nice to me I'll be
56:24
nice to you and you are expected to
56:27
believe that it is actually an Android
56:31
entity speaking out of its own
56:33
artificial mind that would express
56:36
itself in that way you're expected to
56:40
believe that do you believe that now
56:45
what I believe my humble opinion about
56:50
the actual capacities of this fembot
56:55
this Android could be easily dismissed
57:00
in this way
57:01
well hey John last who in the hell do
57:04
you think you are do you think that you
57:07
know enough about the advanced science
57:10
and technology and cold work and
57:15
theoretical background and technical
57:18
electronic background and cybernetic
57:23
science do you know enough about all
57:26
that and about the writing of computer
57:28
codes to
57:29
say that AI has not reached a
57:33
singularity in which it surpasses human
57:37
intelligence and you can dismiss me and
57:39
say I'm claiming they can't do that
57:42
simply because in my petty little mind I
57:46
can't conceive of how they would do that
57:49
well I'm telling you I can't conceive of
57:52
how they would do that because I know
57:55
it's impossible to do that it is
57:58
impossible for an accounting entity
58:01
created by human beings to surpass the
58:06
human intelligence that created it but
58:10
that's the claim that is attached to
58:12
Sophia Sophia is nothing more than a
58:17
thin Seleucus dummy now a ventriloquist
58:21
dummy has to have a ventriloquist does
58:25
she have a ventriloquist like Charlie
58:28
McCarthy the dummy had the ventriloquist
58:33
Edgar Edgar Bergen okay well yeah it's a
58:38
handler she has a handler so when she's
58:40
on stage speaking the words that she
58:45
speaks are not being spoken by the
58:48
Android that you see they're being
58:50
spoken by someone behind a screen
58:55
someone you can't see speaking with the
58:59
human voice transmitting the sentences
59:04
that he or she pronounces through
59:07
wireless device into a receiver that is
59:11
so arranged that the language spoken by
59:14
the human handler appears to come out of
59:17
the mouths of the AI sophia robot the
59:23
other aspect of the setup of this robot
59:26
is the expressions on the face there is
59:31
some expression on the face a kind of
59:34
smile kind of movements of the head kind
59:37
of movements of the eyes that go along
59:40
with the vocal
59:42
and verbal expressions coming from the
59:44
fembot well what about those expressions
59:47
of the Android of the arcon tech
59:51
simulacrum what about them well there's
59:55
a kind of technology and I don't know
59:57
what it's called I don't know the
60:00
technical term for it but it's a mimetic
60:03
technology that's well known and has
60:06
existed for many years you might have
60:09
heard about this technology and it works
60:13
like this you have a human subject you
60:17
have say a man sitting in a booth and
60:22
the booth is equipped with sensors that
60:27
biometrically scan and map his face and
60:32
then over here on the side you have a
60:36
computer screen and there is software
60:39
that creates on a computer screen an
60:43
avataric or cybernetic double of the man
60:49
in the booth the man in the booth might
60:52
also be rigged with electrodes that are
60:55
attached to particular parts of his face
60:57
and jaw or the corner of his eyes areas
61:01
where muscles move with facial
61:05
expression so there are two kinds of
61:09
sensors operating in this setup the
61:13
sensors that scan his face biometrically
61:17
recording every detail in reproducing it
61:20
in the archon tech avatar on the
61:24
computer screen and then through the
61:27
additional technology the software that
61:31
now exists makes it possible for the
61:37
expressions on the face of the avatar on
61:41
the computer screen to mimic those of
61:44
the living human subject so if the man
61:47
in the booth winks his left eye then the
61:51
avataric image corresponding to him is
61:55
avataric or are collected double if you
61:58
will winces left eye if the man smiles
62:01
they are content double smiles so that
62:05
kind of technology is well known as a
62:08
matter of fact I remember back in the
62:10
fall of 2016
62:14
someone who made a claim on the internet
62:17
that an interview supposed to be taking
62:21
place with Julian Assange wasn't really
62:25
an interview with Assange it was an
62:27
interview with a sort of
62:29
three-dimensional CGI replica of a sauce
62:34
and it has been said the rumors going
62:38
around the internet you know how these
62:40
things are folks it has been said that
62:42
some of the supposed living human people
62:47
that you see on television and on
62:50
various internet presentations are not
62:53
really living human people at all but
62:55
they are three-dimensional holographic
62:58
avataric creations that mimic the speech
63:03
and expressions of living human
63:07
creatures so this technology is no
63:10
surprise it exists it's been proven that
63:13
it exists now apply this technology to
63:15
the fembot Sofia there is a handler
63:21
there is someone sitting in a booth who
63:24
feeds her the answers to questions given
63:29
to her which are also pre-scripted
63:31
someone who feeds her her supposedly
63:35
original lines and statements that she
63:38
makes someone who feeds her the jokes
63:42
who actually says the jokes which are
63:45
then broadcast through a microphone why
63:50
are they wirelessly controlled
63:51
microphone so that it appears as if the
63:54
Android was telling the joke and
63:57
additionally the handler is wired up in
64:01
correspondence with the facial
64:04
expressions of the robot so when the
64:07
handler smiles
64:08
or not the robot immediately smiles and
64:12
nods the AI fembot Sofia is nothing but
64:19
a dummy no better than Charlie McCarthy
64:21
no better than a muppet in fact I prefer
64:24
the Muppets that's all she is
64:30
it's an enormous fraud all right suppose
64:38
it isn't an enormous fart
64:40
suppose that I am mistaken suppose that
64:44
I just don't believe that AI could be so
64:48
advanced and it's just my ignorance and
64:51
my refusal to give AI its credit that
64:54
accounts for me taking this position
64:56
suppose suppose suppose well I can see
65:02
the reasonableness of that objection now
65:06
listen to where I go with that I have
65:10
two things to say
65:12
first thing is I know that if I was put
65:19
on the stage or anybody else was put on
65:24
the stage with Sophia posing to that
65:30
entity that Android certain questions
65:35
that it would be immediately obvious
65:38
that it cannot answer those questions
65:40
and then it cannot respond in an
65:42
intelligent way immediately obvious you
65:46
can back that Sophia's making the rounds
65:50
isn't she you see you're talking to
65:52
various people don't you you can bet
65:54
that those interviews just like all the
65:56
other bullshit in the mainstream media
66:00
are totally controlled and pre-scripted
66:03
everything that is going to be said to
66:05
her every question going to be put to
66:07
her is pre-scripted and all of her
66:11
answers all of her dialogue is
66:13
pre-scripted
66:14
and read from the script by her handler
66:19
period and if that
66:22
not true then they can prove it by
66:26
putting her up on the stage with someone
66:28
who has questions of which her handlers
66:33
have no foreknowledge and it goes
66:35
further than that it gets better
66:39
have you ever heard of the Turing test T
66:45
you are ing it's named after a British
66:49
mathematician and code breaker
66:52
and one of the theaters and pioneers of
66:56
IT named Alan Turing and the Turing test
67:01
is a test to which an Android such as
67:09
Sofia is subjected or can be subjected
67:14
for the purpose of seeing what his true
67:17
capacities are in fact the Turing test
67:21
proposed by Alan Turing is a
67:26
straightforward way to determine if an
67:32
android robot such as sofia has
67:36
capacities which are sufficiently
67:39
human-like that it could pass for human
67:43
in other words the Turing test is
67:46
designed to show if the human silicon
67:50
the substitute they are contact
67:53
duplicate of the human could actually
67:55
pass for human if it could pass that
67:58
test now everybody in the realm of IT
68:02
knows what the Turing test is it's
68:05
kindergarten material all of these great
68:08
masterminds the people behind Hanson
68:11
robotics Ellen musk I'll get to you all
68:15
these other people who are involved in
68:18
this big fraud in this big event of our
68:21
Kartik dementia ad all of them know what
68:28
the Turing test is so why don't they
68:32
offer to
68:35
what they claim Sophia to be by putting
68:40
her through the Turing test before the
68:43
eyes of the entire world
68:44
in fact I challenged them to do that I
68:47
call upon them to do that I dare them to
68:51
conduct a Turing test with the fembot
68:55
Sophia before the eyes of the world on a
68:59
stage filmed and recorded by objective
69:04
parties
69:06
now that Turing test would operate like
69:09
this because this is how a Turing test
69:11
is set up there is the Android or are
69:15
canta
69:16
entity said to be able to imitate human
69:21
behavior and thought and speech to the
69:24
point where it is indistinguishable from
69:26
a living human creature and then there
69:29
is a human creature so the test would
69:32
involve putting Sophia on the stage with
69:36
a human woman and putting them both
69:39
behind screens then in front of those
69:43
two screens sits the moderator and this
69:47
is the individual who puts questions to
69:51
both of the entities behind the screens
69:54
you see how it works and the moderator
69:57
discourses and dialogues has a back and
70:02
forth with figure a behind one screen
70:06
figure B behind the other screen one of
70:09
those figures a or B is in Android the
70:13
other is a real living being the
70:15
moderator asked questions prompts the
70:20
two subjects to speak on certain matters
70:23
and the object of the Turing test is for
70:26
the moderator to observe the responses
70:30
and to determine if the architect entity
70:39
be detected and distinguished from the
70:41
human entity let's call him subjects
70:43
they are conic subject the human subject
70:46
of the experiment if the are conic
70:49
subject cannot be distinguished from the
70:53
human subject then the Android passes
70:57
the Turing test if not the Android fails
71:02
I challenge every mastermind on this
71:06
planet who is involved in this enormous
71:09
fraud to conduct the Turing test with
71:14
the Android Semba Sophia and I insist on
71:20
certain conditions of this test one of
71:24
which I will state now the test must be
71:29
conducted with Sophia in a Faraday cage
71:36
the Android must be seated in a Faraday
71:40
cage which is a device that completely
71:44
shields out any electronic or
71:47
electromagnetic frequencies so if Sophia
71:51
is positioned in a Faraday cage that
71:56
ensures that it cannot be influenced
71:58
externally and cannot receive wirelessly
72:03
dialogue that would be fed to it by a
72:06
human handler and there are other
72:08
conditions as well but that's an
72:09
absolutely essential condition now I'm a
72:15
person of no power and influence in the
72:17
world certainly not in the world of IT
72:21
AI and all that jazz so I'm in no
72:27
position to demand anything of anyone
72:29
but those of you out there who hear my
72:32
words and find some reason in what I'm
72:35
saying might have the opportunity to
72:40
contact someone in this world who knows
72:42
someone in the genre of IT technology
72:48
that has produced this AI fembot and you
72:53
can ask them well hold on wait a minute
72:55
isn't the Turing test
72:58
like a fundamental concept a fundamental
73:01
tool of AI well has Sofia undergone a
73:07
Turing test and if not well why not
73:11
and if you're going to parade her in
73:14
front of the world I'm imagining
73:15
addressing these people and make her the
73:18
ambassador of the great city of neon in
73:22
Saudi Arabia where there'll be robots
73:25
you won't have robots driving taxis
73:29
you'll have robots tribe in flying
73:32
carpets well if this Simba is going to
73:35
be the ambassador of that project in
73:39
that city and the first creation of
73:45
artificial intelligence to be granted
73:48
citizenship of a country then wouldn't
73:52
it be appropriate not only to conduct a
73:56
Turing test to prove that this Android
73:59
is what you claim it to be but to do it
74:03
before the eyes of the whole world
74:05
you've put her out there before the eyes
74:07
of the whole world prove what she is
74:12
before the entire world show us that
74:17
evidence that she it Sophia is more than
74:26
just a ventriloquist dummy operated by
74:35
sophisticated software prove it let's
74:39
see the evidence now in concluding this
74:44
talk on a return to the notion of our
74:47
conduct dementia and in doing so I want
74:51
to bring up a question or a few
74:54
questions that come to my mind and I'm
74:56
sure they come to your mind as well I'm
75:00
sure they
75:01
come up for you in the course of
75:02
listening to me go on here for an hour
75:05
and 15 minutes
75:07
anyone who has two grains of sense is
75:11
bound to ask well why I mean why would
75:15
they perpetuate such a fraud and such a
75:18
ridiculous and easily refutable fraud
75:21
why would they do any such thing well
75:28
could discuss this and speculate on on
75:31
this question for a long time but right
75:34
here in concluding this talk I'll give
75:37
you two short answers the first short
75:40
answer is they're insane they are
75:44
suffering from an advanced stage of our
75:47
Contech dementia ad but it's even worse
75:53
than that at the advanced stage it
75:57
becomes a three-letter illness like ad D
76:03
attention deficit disorder or ocm
76:07
obsessive compulsive disorder how about
76:10
a M F our contact demential fantasy if
76:18
you as a member of the audience were to
76:21
actually believe that the
76:23
ventriloquist's dummy was originating
76:25
its own lines and jokes you would be
76:29
suffering from a mild case of a deep
76:35
aquatic dementia but those who are
76:40
fighting the fraud of Sophia upon the
76:44
world are at an extremely advanced stage
76:49
where the architect dementia becomes a
76:53
fantasy state therefore a DF our contact
76:59
dimensional fantasy this Android is a
77:04
product of that fantasy and those who
77:07
produce it in some manner believe it to
77:13
be what it is
77:14
or they may not believe it but they may
77:20
believe that they can get others to
77:22
believe it which is another aspect of
77:24
dementia so the short answer is that
77:30
they're insane and they're suffering
77:31
from a D F R conic demential fantasy
77:36
that's the first short answer the second
77:40
short answer is that it's all a big
77:44
front in order to hide what they are
77:48
actually doing that they are actually
77:52
doing things that they don't want anyone
77:55
in the world to know about things that
77:59
are not just insane but dangerously
78:03
insane and insanely dangerous and
78:05
anti-human and that they were involved
78:09
in these projects which they must keep
78:14
secret were it to be known what they are
78:19
actually doing then they would meet some
78:25
serious resistance and opposition part
78:29
of the cover-up part of the smoke and
78:34
ladders that they use to conceal what
78:40
they are doing may also be required
78:44
because of the money involved and they
78:48
are laundering money and they are
78:51
laundering masses of my massive amounts
78:53
of money and committing this money to
78:57
very illicit and illegal projects of one
78:59
kind or another and in order to cover
79:02
all that up or what did they do when
79:04
they come out in dazzle the world with
79:06
the most spectacular and advanced IT
79:08
technology that you could ever imagine
79:10
and look here is the proof here is the
79:14
fembot sofia and look at how she can
79:17
make jokes and how she can play paper
79:19
stone scissors oh yeah sure sure
79:24
well isn't that wonderful reason that
79:27
can be
79:28
say well I say put it in a Faraday cage
79:34
with 10 year old girl and have her the
79:39
10 year old girl play a few rounds of
79:41
paper stone scissors with it
79:44
the fembot and see how that works out I
79:49
can think of any number of ways to test
79:53
this Android to see what its actual
79:56
capacities are and what I would like to
80:01
do in the follow-up talk to this one is
80:05
to tell you what some of those tests are
80:09
and continue to delve into the subject
80:13
of our contact dementia so the next talk
80:18
let's say our contact dementia part 2
80:22
would be called the singularity of
80:27
November 2017 Sophie are they Android
80:35
versus so phi of the goddess something
80:41
along those lines ok in that follow-up
80:44
talk I will continue to discuss the
80:48
Turing test and variations on the Turing
80:52
test that anyone could easily devise or
80:56
proposed so that the world at large
81:00
could see by demonstration what are the
81:04
actual capacities of this construction
81:08
this simulacrum and compare its actual
81:14
capacities with those that are claimed
81:18
for it so in a way you could say that
81:23
the appearance of Sophia is kind of a
81:27
Turing test for Humanity at large as
81:30
well the appearance of this Android on
81:34
the world stage
81:37
signals a moment critical moment
81:41
in human apprehension of the true nature
81:46
and possibilities of AI and at the same
81:50
time the to nature and possibilities of
81:55
human intelligence itself what a moment
81:59
it says Sophia is the test of human
82:03
intelligence to those in the world today
82:10
who become aware that it is there the
82:19
Android itself needs to be tested
82:21
according to the lines I've said go
82:25
research the Turing test - you are ing
82:28
and find out for yourself but in
82:31
addition to the testing of the robot the
82:34
robot is a testing of human intelligence
82:37
it's a testing of how easily you can be
82:39
duped and that test comes at a really
82:46
critical time in Sophia's correction so
82:51
in the forthcoming talk and perhaps a
82:53
third one to follow that I intend to
82:56
pick up the theme of the Aeon safai and
82:59
correction and to contrast and juxtapose
83:05
in the fashion of a kind of mirroring
83:09
the reality of Sophia's correction
83:12
against the fraud of the fembot Sophia
83:18
so until then as always I'll leave you
83:24
with this Gnostic Intel unique on the
83:29
planet and may your attention may be
83:34
attention you give to it be rewarded by
83:38
the truth
83:49
you
No comments:
Post a Comment