Transcript
00:02
[Music]
00:03
it's important to understand what the 5g
00:07
is doing and what they say it's doing
00:10
we're told on the I Triple E beam
00:14
informing document that this technology
00:17
cooked your eyes like eggs in world or
00:21
new
00:28
and you all need to understand the
00:31
military weapons these are assault
00:34
frequencies
00:39
gartner nothing more than that that's
00:42
what you need to know
00:44
it's microwave radiation for sure is
00:46
what it is
00:55
[Music]
01:16
ladies gentlemen please join me in
01:18
welcoming to the National Press Club
01:20
Federal Communications Commission
01:21
Chairman Tom wheeler it's an honor to be
01:28
here at the National Press Club
01:33
the first generation wireless 1g was
01:38
voice the second generation 2g allowed
01:43
both talk and text the third generation
01:48
3G the Internet in a limited way and
01:52
today's technology 4G completed that
01:56
digital migration but if anyone tells
01:59
you that they know the details of what
02:00
5g is going to become run the other way
02:04
[Applause]
02:07
this video is brought to you by the
02:10
number five and the letter G and pretty
02:13
soon everything else will be too I have
02:17
to tell people
02:19
5 G's akela I'm mark steel
02:23
anybody who hasn't heard me and what the
02:26
systems head-up display expert leading
02:29
experts in the world I've actually
02:31
brought coalition to this the reason I
02:33
became an expert was to invent them what
02:36
I'm going to see it eat idiot do not
02:37
believe a single word I see it not one I
02:42
want you to do your research you'll find
02:44
it tough for you clarifying this 5g rule
02:53
of there's a weapon system I've got to
02:55
let no more circle come because I know
02:57
about what the system is more than
02:58
anything all that in Britain in a place
03:02
in the north of England called Gateshead
03:04
a scientist there called mark steel has
03:08
been very publicly and actively warning
03:13
people about the effects of LED
03:17
streetlights which he says in Gateshead
03:20
are emitting now 5g I've just come to
03:27
whether these kids have talked with us
03:28
about the piercing this say this these
03:31
transmitters on these lakes that of
03:33
course harm
03:34
assault in the community this is an
03:37
existential threat to the economy to the
03:39
environment and humanity with these
03:41
transmitters or everywhere then
03:43
everyone's it was true
03:45
[Music]
03:47
[Applause]
03:49
[Music]
03:52
there's a lot of confusion about what 5g
03:55
is the G stands for generation so you
03:58
started off with the first transmitter
04:01
system back in the 1980s and then yetis
04:03
yes we have one G then your 2g and as
04:06
the generations moved on we started to
04:08
see more complex signal systems cleverer
04:14
pieces of you know antenna designs etc
04:18
etc so the whole thing became more data
04:22
quicker data quicker downloads etc etc
04:25
however 5g is something completely
04:29
different
04:31
[Music]
04:33
all right let's get a break though let's
04:36
tell the people what this really is this
04:38
is the 5g transmission device bring
04:42
connect that's a hell of a beast art
04:43
isn't it
04:44
these are the uninsurable transmitters
04:46
just get a good look at that guys
04:48
because obviously I know there's quite a
04:49
few experts who want to see more detail
04:53
about the transmitters and the chipsets
04:56
stava good luck boys this is the control
05:00
management system mastery there's no
05:02
antenna there you see that what is this
05:04
fears the rear antenna here what's that
05:07
this is for Fears are you all right as
05:10
you'll see it's got a driver that's got
05:12
some chip takes one chip with a chip set
05:15
on this this is a disturbing world order
05:18
this what it gets it counts of see I'll
05:21
tell you what I think the Vela sent some
05:22
of these educated fools by at the school
05:24
what you send them to prison which I was
05:27
the easiest I think prisons probably
05:28
better
05:30
that's 5j guys that's 5g Hall a must
05:37
consider the whole part played by
05:39
electricity in nature human beings
05:41
cannot go on developing in the same way
05:43
in an atmosphere permeated on all sides
05:46
by electric currents and radiations it
05:48
has an influence on the whole
05:49
development of man this life of men in
05:52
the midst of electricity notably radiant
05:54
electricity will presently affect them
05:56
in such a way that they will no longer
05:57
be able to understand the news which
05:59
they received so rapidly the effect is
06:02
to damp down their intelligence such
06:03
effects are already seen today even
06:06
today you can notice how people
06:07
understand the things that come to them
06:09
with far greater difficulty than they
06:11
did a few decades ago Rudolf Steiner
06:15
1924 Rudolf Steiner noted that in 1924
06:20
since then our atmosphere has become far
06:22
more permeated with electric waves of
06:24
widely diverse types there's no doubt
06:28
now that electric waves electromagnetic
06:31
forces cause direct biological effects
06:35
there's thousands of peer-reviewed
06:37
papers on this subject there's no doubt
06:40
about it but what are these effects how
06:43
are they affecting us what can we do
06:45
about it
06:46
we're now at a stage where we're putting
06:49
in what's called 5g which is a special
06:52
type of broadcast for high density
06:55
information transfers and it turns out
06:58
that this is the same frequency bands
07:00
that are used in crowd dispersal weapon
07:05
[Music]
07:16
[Music]
07:21
five T first and foremost is
07:23
densification so it's significantly more
07:27
transmitters at close proximity to the
07:31
human and it is also a sophisticated a
07:35
lead of unlawful transmitter what I mean
07:39
by that is it is a high gear dielectric
07:44
lens antenna and what that allows 5g
07:48
transmitters to do is to 3d map its
07:52
environment in your home the 868
07:57
megahertz frequency is specific for
08:00
battlefield interrogation systems so sub
08:03
gigahertz that allows the signal to
08:06
travel through concrete brick work with
08:09
ease and it can actually day together
08:13
it is a target the choir of the system
08:17
fears the rear is basically read off the
08:20
battlefield it is extremely good at
08:24
identifying targets and being a lock on
08:27
the targets and not only that it can
08:30
specifically target you as an individual
08:33
so any judge sitting on a an interesting
08:37
case let's see any lawyer and he
08:40
barrister anybody doing any work on his
08:42
potentially controversial your life
08:44
could be a threat so the antenna design
08:48
that you currently have non-stop of
08:51
these LED streetlights masquerading as a
08:54
contour management system it basically
08:57
power field interrogation equipment
09:00
the first fears the rear unit was
09:02
actually called mum it used to by the
09:05
Germans during the Second World War to
09:07
identify Allied aircraft obviously
09:10
things have moved on significantly since
09:13
then
09:22
well I joined the Royal Navy in 1960 and
09:28
I specialized in microwave warfare radar
09:34
obviously which uses microwave but they
09:37
don't just teach you radar they teach
09:39
you all about microwaves and other uses
09:42
so I understood about microwave warfare
09:46
and how it can damage people how it can
09:48
harm people microwaves then were used as
09:52
weapons as they are today it is a
09:55
perfect stealth weapon and when
09:59
governments don't like a group of people
10:02
for instance that the ladies who protest
10:06
at Greenham common in England about the
10:09
American missile base they can't they
10:11
were microwaved we might throw both
10:14
Catholics in Northern Ireland to make
10:16
them sick it goes on all over the world
10:19
and it's a weapon that you don't know
10:22
you're being targeted because the dose
10:24
is very very low which is actually more
10:27
dangerous than a high dose it's very
10:30
very low and it may take a year or two
10:33
but you can you can cause neurological
10:36
damage and cancers with low-level
10:39
microwaves and you can make all your
10:41
opponents sick it it's a perfect weapon
10:44
for a government
10:47
our impulses are being redirected we are
10:51
living in an artificially induced state
10:53
of consciousness that resembles sleep
10:56
their intention to rule rests with the
10:59
annihilation of consciousness we have
11:02
been loaned into a trance they have made
11:05
us indifferent to ourselves to others we
11:09
are focused only on please understand
11:13
they are safe
11:15
as long as they are not discovered to
11:17
keep us asleep keep us selfish keep us
11:20
safe
11:21
almost immediately I had neighbors
11:24
knocking on the door talking about
11:26
children bleeding from the nose I have
11:28
images posted on Facebook for more
11:30
neighbor in particular killed my dog and
11:34
mentioned the fact that since the LED
11:36
street lighting had been installed she
11:39
was bleeding from the nose every single
11:41
night I thought was unbelievable however
11:44
I spoke to another neighbor who lived
11:47
not far from the first lady who
11:49
mentioned this and she also confirmed
11:52
that since the LED streetlight had been
11:55
installed she also had started to
11:58
develop nosebleeds and it never had
12:00
nosebleeds before in her life that then
12:04
put me on a journey to investigate a
12:09
measurement microwave radiation levels
12:11
from the transmitters on top of the LED
12:14
streetlights the basic 868 megahertz it
12:18
was significantly higher than the
12:21
current comes through 1815 resolution
12:25
which is a maximum of 600 millivolts of
12:28
measure doctors over 3,000 millivolts
12:31
five times five to six times higher than
12:34
the than the guidelines significantly
12:36
higher than than the current council
12:38
European 15 resolution which states that
12:41
200 millivolts should be the maximum
12:45
that by your initiative report states
12:48
that it should be significant less than
12:50
that so we've got the council Europe
12:51
that's you know the the the
12:54
international
12:55
quartz or spirit nut you know the
12:57
learner judges have said that 200
12:59
millivolts and are measuring in bedrooms
13:01
and get set minimum minimum 600 in the
13:06
4000 does this mean that in 2020 2021
13:10
when 5g is destined to roll out globally
13:13
that you're going to get those kind of
13:15
readings everywhere all the time
13:17
everywhere all it's worse than that
13:19
worse enough yes 5g will connect the
13:24
internet of everything if something can
13:26
be connected it will be connected in a
13:28
5g world hundreds of billions of
13:31
microchips connected in products from
13:36
pill bottles to plant waters requiring
13:39
massive deployment of small cells we
13:43
won't wait for the standards now to make
13:46
this work five the 5g build out is going
13:49
to be very infrastructure intensive we
13:54
must reject the notion that the 5g
13:57
future will be the sole provenance of
14:00
urban areas the 5g revolution will touch
14:05
all corners and that's damn important
14:10
the interconnected world of the future
14:14
will be the result of decisions we must
14:17
make today
14:28
[Music]
14:31
the main issue before us today is Senate
14:34
bill 637 and Senate bill 894 the former
14:38
by Senator hue and the latter by Senator
14:40
nobs we're gonna invite the first four
14:43
witnesses in support of the legislation
14:46
and that would be John Jones with Sprint
14:48
David Lewis and Andy Emerson with AT&T;
14:51
Neil Creve with Verizon and Frank out
14:54
committee jr. with t-mobile so be
14:57
straight with me is it true
15:00
it could be gentlemen practice these
15:10
words in front of the mirror although we
15:12
are constantly exploring the subject
15:14
currently there is no direct evidence
15:17
that links cell phone usage to brain
15:20
cancer
15:24
[Music]
15:30
I'm Sharon Goldberg I'm an internal
15:33
medicine physician I've practiced
15:34
medicine for 21 years and my background
15:37
is mostly academic internal medicine
15:39
Hospital based clinical research and
15:42
medical education
15:42
I'm a certified Microsoft small business
15:45
specialist I worked on space station
15:47
designing the cabling system for the
15:49
airlock module where as responsible for
15:51
EMI EMC analysis which is
15:52
electromagnetic interference
15:54
electromagnetic compatibility a
15:56
professor in the Department of
15:58
Epidemiology biostatistics and
16:00
occupational health and I teach they're
16:03
both toxicology and health effects of
16:06
electromagnetic radiation my name is
16:08
Donna Tocqueville and I'm the founder of
16:10
organization called we are the evidence
16:12
we are an organization that represents
16:15
the many adults and unfortunately many
16:17
children who has become very sick from
16:19
wireless technology radiation there
16:21
seems to be a couple false Easter eggs
16:23
being put out there right now I want to
16:24
make sure we dispel that right off the
16:26
gate the effects of Wireless on health
16:30
scientifically are very very clear so
16:34
it's always pushed back to the
16:36
definition of an acceptable level of
16:38
radiation and that's what this is by the
16:40
way this is about radiation wireless
16:42
radiation has biological effects period
16:45
my name is dr. Angie Colbeck I've been
16:49
reviewing the studies showing the
16:51
impacts of wireless radiation on our
16:53
health and there are now thousands of
16:55
studies showing the following adverse
16:58
health impacts to wireless radiation
17:00
cancer oxidative damage DNA damage DNA
17:05
failure things like memory dizziness
17:09
anxiety brain fog headaches nose bits
17:13
cognitive problem exhaustion we have it
17:16
evidence of DNA damage cardiomyopathy
17:19
which is the precursor of congestive
17:20
heart failure short and long term memory
17:23
loss decreased attention spans lower
17:26
reaction times even involuntary
17:29
contractions of muscles causing
17:31
misalignments of spines and jaws breast
17:34
cancer we suddenly have breast cancer in
17:36
women who have
17:37
DNA predisposition disrupted immune
17:40
function and change in stress proteins
17:43
reproductive and fertility effects there
17:46
are dozens and dozens of studies that
17:47
show beyond any doubt what this
17:50
radiation is doing to our sperm now if
17:53
you take this the the cell phone out of
17:55
your pocket the sperm will recuperate
17:58
within three to four months what would
18:00
not recuperate would be the damage to
18:02
the DNA of the sperm that is irreparable
18:05
the wife of the ex governor of Indiana
18:08
was diagnosed with glioblastoma same
18:11
brain tumor Ted Kennedy half and John
18:13
McCain had did you look at John McCain's
18:15
car this is a cell phone brain tumor
18:18
LeBron James one of our sports people
18:21
had a salivary gland tumor that is
18:24
another cell phone tumor you didn't hear
18:27
about it because immediately after that
18:28
was discovered he would pay it was paid
18:30
by Samsung to become their spokesperson
18:33
we are seeing increases in in brain
18:35
tumors we're seeing increases in
18:37
Alzheimer's we're seeing increases in
18:39
all of the neurotransmitter diseases ALS
18:43
Lou Gehrig's disease Parkinson's these
18:46
are all disease systems that are known
18:49
to be associated with low-level energy
18:51
exposures we talk about 24/7
18:54
around-the-clock exposure wherever you
18:56
are and your whole body you never get
18:58
away from it and it seems from our
19:00
studies that maybe your immune system
19:03
can cope with for a time but it will
19:06
deteriorate then the irradiation will
19:09
definitely damage cells at the deeper
19:11
level and the question is what will then
19:14
happen these are out of peer-reviewed
19:16
papers so these are not just
19:18
hypochondriacs thinking that they're
19:20
doing it we're having real problems with
19:22
this this is no longer a subject for
19:25
debate when you look at PubMed in the
19:26
peer reviewed literature these effects
19:29
are seen in all life forms plants
19:31
animals insects microbes so 5g is not a
19:35
conversation about whether or not these
19:37
biological effects exist they clearly do
19:41
there is scientifically evidence that is
19:44
so strong that you can be certain that
19:48
the standards used by the SCC
19:50
to manage health effects are wrong we
19:54
need to start measuring how much
19:56
radiation are people being exposed to
19:59
before we roll out 5g there are four
20:03
kinds of electromagnetic fields that we
20:05
know are harmful to human health
20:07
so radiofrequency radiation magnetic
20:11
fields dirty electricity and electric
20:13
fields okay our exposure any given
20:16
person and all humans are affected by
20:19
EMFs what is our exposure and in a day
20:22
it's not one cellphone its cellphones
20:26
it's multiple wireless networks it's
20:28
smart meters its cell towers it's this
20:31
sandwich and it all adds up the data
20:34
we're going to look at are all published
20:36
science testing results or public
20:38
standards at the bottom end of the
20:40
radiation scale of what's called power
20:42
density or signal strength is the
20:44
minimum level at which cellphones will
20:46
work which was found to be point to
20:48
billions of a micro watt per centimeter
20:50
squared pine needles were found to age
20:53
prematurely at point zero zero zero zero
20:56
to seven at short-term exposures of
20:59
point zero five children aged 8 to 17
21:02
experienced headache irritation
21:05
concentration difficulties and
21:06
behavioral problems point one is the BAU
21:10
biology or building biology guideline
21:12
for extreme concern
21:14
1.0 produced sperm DNA fragmentation and
21:18
a decrease in sperm viability in vitro
21:20
also at 1.0 the science shows the
21:23
following bodily effects can occur
21:25
headaches dizziness fatigue insomnia
21:27
chest pain difficulty breathing and in
21:30
digestion 2.5 saw altered calcium
21:35
metabolism and heart muscle cells 4.0
21:38
changes in the hippocampus affecting
21:40
brain memory and learning and at 6.0 DNA
21:43
damage in cells so where are smart
21:46
meters on this list electrical power
21:49
Institute in December 2010 measured a
21:52
single eye Tron smart meter with pulses
21:54
up to seven point nine three micro watts
21:57
per centimeter squared our own testing
21:59
indicated approximately 8.0 with one
22:02
meter these tests are at a close
22:04
distance approximately one foot away
22:06
from the meter but an infant's crib
22:08
could be just as close on the other side
22:09
of the wall where the meter or Bank of
22:11
meters are installed even though there
22:14
are all these known health effects at
22:16
levels far lower Switzerland
22:17
Liechtenstein and Luxembourg see fit to
22:20
set the standard at nine point five and
22:22
China Poland and Russia 10.0 this is the
22:27
same level at which behavior has been
22:29
altered producing reflexes of avoidance
22:31
following 30-minute exposures a room of
22:35
twelve smart meters are very common and
22:37
even a conservative number in an
22:38
apartment building test it at 19.8
22:41
microwatts per centimeter squared this
22:44
is hundreds of times higher than levels
22:46
which clearly indicate harmful effects
22:48
so how can you Atilla teas and
22:51
government's get away with forcing these
22:52
devices on everyone this is how in
22:55
Canada in the US and several other
22:58
civilized countries the safety limit is
23:00
set at 600 to 1000 micro watts per
23:03
centimeter squared this so-called safety
23:06
limit is literally tens of thousands of
23:08
times higher than levels which are known
23:10
to damage health according to
23:12
peer-reviewed published science
23:17
[Music]
23:23
faster better more reliable internet
23:27
that's the promise of 5g technology but
23:31
there is also the peril health hazards
23:35
associated with radio frequency that is
23:40
higher also and requires more
23:45
transmitters and in antennas and the
23:48
stark simple fact is the health hazards
23:53
are unknown and unstudied and that is a
23:59
sign of neglect and disregard on the
24:01
part of the Federal Communications
24:03
Commission that seems unacceptable
24:07
there have been no answers so far the
24:09
FCC basically has said everything's fine
24:13
but in order to reach a conclusion about
24:17
the health and safety of this new
24:19
technology we need facts chairman thank
24:24
you for having this hearing 5g as you
24:27
well know also uses higher frequency
24:30
waves that don't travel as far and will
24:32
rely on a network of hundreds of
24:35
thousands potentially millions of small
24:37
cell sites and the question then is are
24:40
there any health implication and he's
24:44
public safety implication to those
24:47
additional sites that are likely be
24:50
located close to homes schools
24:53
workplaces and closer and closer to the
24:57
ground
24:58
correct
25:00
correct senator yes so my question for
25:05
for you particularly mr. Gillan and mr.
25:07
Barry how much money has the industry
25:13
committed to supporting additional
25:15
independent research I stress
25:17
independent research is that independent
25:21
research ongoing has any been completed
25:24
where can consumers look for it and
25:29
we'll talk about research on the
25:31
biological effects of this new
25:33
technology Thank You senator and I think
25:36
thank you for your focus on the issue
25:38
safety is paramount and as you alluded
25:41
to we rely on the expert agency rely on
25:43
the findings of the FDA and others as to
25:46
the requirements to keep all of us safe
25:48
there are no industry back studies to my
25:52
knowledge right now happy to visit with
25:54
you as to what opportunities you think
25:56
there needs to be more studies and we're
25:58
always for more science we also rely on
26:00
what the scientists tell us so
26:04
essentially the answer my question how
26:07
much money zero I can certainly follow
26:13
up with you senator to my knowledge
26:14
there's no active studies being backed
26:16
by industry today anybody else know of
26:20
industry commitments to feedback
26:22
research funded support it to ascertain
26:29
scientifically the health effect no I'm
26:33
not aware of and you know there really
26:35
is no research ongoing we're kind of
26:37
flying blind here so far as health and
26:41
safety is concern Thank You mr. chairman
26:46
[Music]
26:52
you're trained medical professional yes
26:54
we don't have one on the panel what are
26:56
we to make with of the American Cancer
26:59
Society for example telling us there's
27:02
no evidence of harmful product many of
27:07
these organizations have conflicts of
27:09
interest very briefly if you can what do
27:12
you what's your definite what do you
27:12
mean by conflict of interest one of the
27:14
first things that you teach residents is
27:16
that you always have to look at the
27:19
funding there's a tremendous amount of
27:22
sponsored research by people who are
27:24
hired to do studies to find no effect
27:27
and that's plagued this field in a
27:31
number of countries the radiofrequency
27:34
radiation work that we did was supported
27:37
by a Motorola the relationship was
27:40
really very cordial and very stress-free
27:44
but only up until we started to
27:48
generating data these folks were very
27:50
very upset and began to talk about how
27:53
are they going to handle this
27:54
what sort of spin can we put on this
27:56
what can we expect from this and from
27:59
that point on the relationship changed
28:01
what we saw was that Motorola began to
28:04
exert more and more control over the
28:06
work telling us what to do telling us
28:09
how to write abstracts what to say in
28:12
the abstracts what to say in the papers
28:14
how to do the work no don't do this yes
28:18
do it this way this was unacceptable
28:23
I had completed our study of DNA damage
28:27
and I submitted the final report to
28:30
Motorola they simply weren't willing to
28:33
accept my interpretation of my study my
28:38
evaluation of my study my knowledge of
28:42
science at that point and tried to urge
28:46
me not to publish the study did you hear
28:50
about people coming to you as far as as
28:52
far as we kind of complaints about
28:54
illness we were made aware of health
28:56
complaints following installation of
28:58
smart meters and we wanted to verify
29:00
this using our field work so I measured
29:04
the field of about 30 different people
29:06
while they stood one foot in front of
29:08
the smart meter and in every single case
29:10
the human energy field was obliterated
29:14
as they stood in front of the smart
29:16
meter so in our first slides what we see
29:19
is normal cells and the structure of the
29:22
cells is intact and sound this is what
29:26
we would expect from a normal sample so
29:28
after two minutes of exposure in front
29:30
of the smart meter at about one foot
29:32
away we see a totally different story
29:35
sample one you can see a lot of
29:37
degradation in the cells the cell walls
29:39
have been broken and you see changes in
29:42
the cells which are called mycoplasma it
29:45
shows a mutation to the cell in the
29:47
second sample we seems a different type
29:49
of degradation to the cell membranes you
29:52
can see a corrugation here this is
29:54
called bottle cap formation and it's
29:57
known that this occurs due to oxidation
30:00
or exposure to free radicals so this
30:04
third subject when we did her sample she
30:07
had to be pulled away from the meter
30:09
after 45 seconds because she complained
30:12
about a increasingly severe headache
30:14
and here you see a phenomenon called
30:17
reuleaux where the red blood cells are
30:19
stacking up which makes it very
30:21
difficult for the blood to deliver
30:23
oxygen to the tissues as they would be
30:26
their normal function every single one
30:28
of these is a degradation every single
30:30
one of these shows of trauma to the
30:31
blood cells and that came from something
30:34
and the only variable was the smart
30:36
meter the good news in all this is the
30:39
patient's and the blood can return to
30:41
normal once they have been removed from
30:43
the influences of these stressors
30:47
[Music]
30:59
[Music]
31:15
[Music]
31:28
some of the effects that we can look at
31:31
well one thing is is just our regular
31:33
Wi-Fi 2.4 gigahertz that's in the same
31:37
range as microwave ovens which are also
31:40
called radar ranges because that is
31:42
radar 2.4 gigahertz is interesting it's
31:46
not the peak absorption rate in water
31:49
for microwave frequencies but it's at a
31:53
point where it allows full penetration
31:55
because if it came in at the peak it
31:58
would prevent the insides from getting
32:00
warm so that's what basic Wi-Fi now when
32:04
we look at 5g 60 gigahertz this is what
32:10
they call active dispersal sort of
32:12
weaponry just to keep people back it
32:14
burns the skin it doesn't penetrate but
32:17
60 gigahertz is the frequency of oxygen
32:20
molecule absorption since they have
32:24
electrons that they share with each
32:25
other what we breathe is actually oh two
32:27
pair of oxygen so being bombarded with
32:31
60 gigahertz could very well impair our
32:35
oxygen absorption rates in our body and
32:38
thereby the whole basis of our living
32:41
system Martin Paul says putting tens of
32:45
millions of 5g antennas without a single
32:48
biological test of safety has to be
32:50
about the stupidest idea anyone has had
32:53
in the history of the world so assessing
32:57
all this we have experts in various
32:59
fields military EMF weaponry biological
33:04
effects on humans firefighters that are
33:07
getting cognitive impairment by being
33:09
there in them countries that are banning
33:12
these sort of technologies around
33:14
schools because of the impairment to
33:16
cognitive let's weigh that up in light
33:19
of what Rudolf Steiner said in 1924
33:21
about just mere radio causing the
33:24
impairment of cognitive functions on
33:26
people that they can receive news from
33:28
around the world but they can't
33:30
understand it as well because of the
33:32
effect of the electricity we have to say
33:35
something smells sinister here with the
33:42
fifth generation it's actually a whole
33:44
new ballgame it's not using the same
33:46
technology they use they're switching to
33:48
military-grade millimeter wave
33:50
technology and when you look at this
33:52
technology and if you go and look at
33:54
DARPA reports kind of look at some of
33:56
the patents that the United States
33:57
military has put out on what they can do
33:59
with psychological weapons all sorts of
34:02
things crowd control Active Denial
34:04
anything you can think of this is what
34:07
they can do with 5g so any type of
34:09
military application you can think of
34:11
which is has an electromagnetic base
34:13
they can do with 5g and they're putting
34:15
this out blanket across the population
34:20
ladies and gentlemen the President of
34:23
the United States good evening my fellow
34:25
Americans in the council's of government
34:28
we must guard against the acquisition of
34:31
unwarranted influence whether sought or
34:34
unsought by the military-industrial
34:36
complex the potential for the disastrous
34:40
rise of misplaced power exists and will
34:43
persist we must never let the weight of
34:46
this combination endanger our liberties
34:48
or democratic processes
34:59
[Music]
35:01
the FCC is a captured agency they
35:05
probably conducted what I believe to be
35:07
the biggest fraud on the public ever
35:09
conducted the FCC has been described by
35:12
Harvard University's Center for Ethics
35:14
writer Norman alster as the most
35:16
captured agency in DC acting more as a
35:20
industry cheerleader than a regulator
35:22
this is especially true today with 5g
35:25
where there are serious safety concerns
35:27
and potentially misleading information
35:29
coming from the FCC for example the
35:31
previous chairman of the FCC is Tom
35:33
wheeler he was the head of the wireless
35:35
log Association for 14 years now
35:37
remember Obama told us there will be no
35:39
lobbyists in his administration so he
35:41
took the biggest lobby and put him as
35:44
ahead of the FCC and that's damn
35:47
important the 90-93 the FCC started a
35:56
rulemaking to adopt the I Triple E
35:58
regulations on this issue I Triple E is
36:01
an engineer Association why is it that
36:04
we adopt regulation of engineers who
36:07
maybe know how to measure this radiation
36:09
it's passing a wall but not when it's
36:11
passing a body all our health agencies
36:14
objected it saying that it makes no
36:15
sense to adopt engineer Association that
36:18
they had not even one biomechanical
36:20
person on their on their team they're
36:21
effectively indemnified against adverse
36:24
health impacts when the acceptable
36:28
limits are higher than the limits
36:30
actually shown to show harmful health
36:33
effects the FCC guidelines were
36:35
developed for short-term exposures six
36:38
minutes it's 30 minutes depending on
36:40
it's a phone or an outdoor exposure and
36:42
they have absolutely no connection to
36:46
the biological effects that have been
36:49
very clearly summarized in the bio
36:51
initiative so as you can see there's a
36:53
number of individuals in this room today
36:55
that have serious concerns about this as
36:58
regards to their health if one of your
37:00
companies decides to
37:02
put one of these small cells up at a
37:04
pole that's within say 50 feet of one of
37:06
their houses what recourse do they have
37:09
to say is there a way to move it
37:11
somewhere else there there's language in
37:14
the bill so that the authority can
37:16
require the applicant to come forth with
37:20
certification of compliance with the
37:22
FCC's rules related to radiofrequency
37:23
emission
37:24
remember that denial of request or
37:26
denial permit request that you can put
37:28
in it's going to point back to the
37:30
acceptable levels as determined by the
37:32
FCC not the EPA are not the CDC the ones
37:36
who usually take care of health concerns
37:37
but by the FCC which is staffed by
37:40
former f-numbers of the
37:42
telecommunication industry that's the
37:44
fox guarding the hen house it's a fact
37:48
that most insurance companies will not
37:50
indemnify against EMF effects telecom
37:55
companies around the world are warning
37:57
their investors of potential major costs
38:00
due to real or alleged risks of EMF
38:04
pollution from their products
38:05
interestingly enough they're warning
38:08
their investors but they're not telling
38:09
their customers they're basically
38:11
keeping it quiet because that's where
38:14
the money comes from so we're using
38:16
technology that could be very
38:18
potentially harmful to us and the
38:20
investors know it but their only worry
38:22
is that they might lose money
38:24
not that our health might be affected
38:27
first of all I think what you should
38:29
really think about is why is it that
38:31
they're not insured it's honor they
38:33
chose to be self-insured they actually
38:35
rejected by the insurance company from
38:37
being insured cuz then it's time to resk
38:38
so the insurance companies the big
38:41
insurance companies will not insure the
38:43
telecommunications called secondary
38:46
insurance companies secondary insurance
38:48
companies are the insurance companies
38:50
that insure the insurance companies so
38:52
in a event an insurance company let's
38:54
say I insure Verizon and it may not be
38:58
able to meet the claims then the
39:01
secondary insurance company is kicking
39:03
in like Lloyd's of London sorry likewise
39:05
of Lloyds of London and Swiss rail both
39:09
told the insurance company not to insure
39:12
the wireless industry and this is why
39:13
they're not insured and that should give
39:15
you a hint now this is exactly why they
39:18
have to prevent it health in a lawsuit
39:20
and how do they prevent lawsuit that
39:22
goes back to Section 704
39:33
section 704 was passed in 1996 this is
39:38
how our rights in regards to health were
39:40
taking away by the wireless industry
39:42
what is the distillation did it gave the
39:45
power to regulate the health effects of
39:47
wireless technology to the FCC F this is
39:50
a spectrum auctioning agency it's not a
39:52
health agency they don't even have one
39:54
biomedical person on their team and then
39:57
the other thing is section 704 did it
40:00
actually took the power from the state
40:02
to regulate location of cell towers
40:05
based on health and what does it means
40:07
it means that if they want to put a cell
40:09
tower in front of your home you cannot
40:11
go to City Council say hey stop I don't
40:13
want it I just heard it lecture that
40:14
there are 10,000 studies proving that
40:16
it's harmful
40:17
I don't want it my child is sick the
40:19
hotel's stop you're not allowed to
40:20
mention this in the City Council because
40:23
section 704 says that if you will and if
40:26
the application will be rejected the
40:28
city will be sued can be sued by the
40:30
wise industry
40:38
a major US government study on rats
40:45
finds a link between cell phones and
40:47
cancer very first government study
40:49
linking the radiation from cell phones
40:51
to cancer to decade $30,000,000
40:54
federal study out today found there is
40:56
some evidence of a link between cell
40:59
phone radiation and brain cancer after
41:02
what is the NDP have heard that study
41:03
several times in DPS work so it's a 25
41:06
million dollar study on the rats and
41:08
mice that was supposed to demonstrate
41:11
that there were no effects of radiation
41:14
below thermal and in fact it
41:17
demonstrated exactly the opposite and it
41:20
follows on the heels of two major
41:23
studies and animals that said exactly
41:25
the same thing and that study was
41:28
designed perfectly to make sure that it
41:31
cannot be a challenge that there will
41:33
not be any doubt that's why it took them
41:35
14 years that's how they prevent a
41:37
discussion of health and why do they
41:39
want to prevent discussion of house if
41:41
there's no problem with health
41:43
simply put FCC is completely unprepared
41:46
unable and possibly unwilling to oversee
41:49
5g for safety even as it barrels toward
41:52
us they are falling back on tired
41:54
definitions and panaceas long since
41:56
disproven by science to make matters
41:58
worse recent FCC rulings at numerous
42:01
industry friendly bills passed at state
42:03
and federal levels between 2016 and 2018
42:06
removed the last vestiges of local and
42:09
state review over infrastructure
42:11
sightings just when we need it the most
42:14
when those first studies were performed
42:16
these years and years ago nobody knew
42:19
about the importance of the microbiome
42:21
the role of the microbiome and the
42:24
immune system and even less the role of
42:26
the microbiota inside our brains that is
42:29
the microbes that are normally resident
42:32
inside our brains whose influence on
42:34
brain function is nothing but immense
42:37
anyway think well who cares about
42:39
microbes delays microbes we have the
42:41
abilities well you we know by now that
42:44
this is not absolutely the case because
42:47
microbes are truly essential for
42:50
development and function of all our
42:52
organs and systems our immune system is
42:55
based on the microbes we have in our gut
42:58
and our brain also as my crops that
43:02
influence its function in tests it's
43:07
been found things like mold if you grow
43:10
mold inside a Faraday cage it'll grow
43:12
one way in that even if the
43:14
electromagnetic fields are around take
43:16
the Faraday cage away and some sort of
43:18
600 biotoxins are developed within the
43:21
mold because of the effects of the EMFs
43:24
upon it electromagnetic fields even of
43:27
weak quality have an effect upon our
43:30
microbiome which is really essential to
43:33
our whole being this is going to
43:35
eviscerate microbial DNA inside human
43:38
beings which is our effective operating
43:40
system number one so it may not impact
43:43
human DNA in laboratory experiments
43:46
right now and they're saying it doesn't
43:48
impact human DNA but given that human
43:50
DNA is less than 1% of the cellular DNA
43:54
in the human body the rest of the
43:56
cellular DNA is microbial and we know
43:59
that this will eviscerate microbial DNA
44:01
so we're talking about a takedown of the
44:04
operating system of human beings exactly
44:06
exactly I couldn't have put it better
44:08
myself
44:14
goblin morning mr. Brandt Wow Amanda now
44:22
you guys are covering up chemtrails no
44:25
we are not covering it we have we have
44:27
no reason to cover up to cover it up
44:33
well you personally I'm you would lose
44:36
your job you were due to reveal anything
44:38
to me and it's probably unsafe really
44:40
even be speaking about this you work for
44:44
it's not unsafe no problem with us
44:48
talking on your system you're making a
44:50
complaint the complaint an area that we
44:55
don't we don't have authority to
44:57
regulate
45:04
so the connection between chemtrails and
45:08
5g it's all interconnected the
45:11
metallized particulates that would allow
45:14
the 5g fears the rear so basically the
45:17
radar that would allow it to people
45:19
identify you
45:20
so then watch you are gonna identify you
45:23
in your own home 24 hours a day seven
45:26
days a week for the last X amount of
45:28
years we've been through chem trailing
45:31
and that is now the cat is out of the
45:33
box we've had these nano particulates
45:36
raining down on humanity for years now
45:40
impregnating our bodies by best account
45:43
staying inside our bodies
45:45
those nano particulates what you're
45:47
saying are creating building up a kind
45:50
of a phosphorescent glow capability so
45:54
that we can be flagged up in our homes
45:56
behind concrete and steel inside bunkers
45:59
in the basement doesn't matter where you
46:01
are the 5g we'll be able to now
46:03
triangulate map and read you because you
46:06
as a living being are impregnated with
46:09
these nano particulates which are acting
46:11
as a kind of transmission and reception
46:12
technology - exactly absolutely exactly
46:16
you have to consider that DNA also works
46:20
as a fractal antenna which is able to
46:24
send and receive and also to process
46:27
signals under the form of radio
46:30
frequencies well then there is no doubt
46:32
that artificial radio frequencies such
46:36
as those on cell towers and in
46:38
particular these and new types of towers
46:41
that have a much higher density of
46:44
signals they may somehow interfere with
46:49
the ability of DNA to retain and
46:52
transmit biological signals so this is
46:55
one level of danger that very few
46:58
biologists are aware of
47:03
how much effort was put forward to
47:05
address this the other what most of
47:08
these people are many of these people
47:10
are here for which is other health
47:11
concerns
47:12
was there any dialogue back and forth
47:14
was there any working I was there when
47:16
many studies evaluated to look at
47:18
regarding this area maybe not every
47:22
person that has concerns in the
47:23
legislation was brought to the table
47:25
okay so from your perspective you feel
47:27
that there was a legitimate amount of
47:29
time to evaluate the data that the
47:31
opposition would have on this absolutely
47:33
and I am I wouldn't put forth something
47:36
that I didn't believe in and I'll tell
47:38
you as I mentioned earlier and it's been
47:41
commented several times amongst the
47:43
panel here this is truly an economic
47:46
development issue our three-year-olds
47:49
again at home is outraged when we pull
47:52
out the driveway and he's not able to
47:54
access Wi-Fi
47:55
[Music]
48:01
but I think anyone who puts Wi-Fi into a
48:04
school should be locked up for the rest
48:07
of their life
48:07
I really do I think they're not fit to
48:11
walk on the surface of this planet
48:13
because they haven't looked at the
48:16
research and whatever incentive they
48:19
have it is not worth the genetic
48:23
problems that parents are going to face
48:26
with their children when they're born
48:29
France has banned Wi-Fi in nursery
48:32
schools and put warnings out for regular
48:35
schools because they're finding there's
48:37
impaired learning capacity and children
48:39
when they're around Wi-Fi and they have
48:42
to put up warning signs where they put
48:44
Wi-Fi transmitters when I got sick and I
48:48
learned that they're putting Wi-Fi in
48:49
schools in Israel I was very sick at the
48:52
time but I could not tolerate the
48:54
thought the children in the schools will
48:56
become as sick as I have and after few
48:58
months of Correspondence I submitted a
49:01
Supreme Court case in Israel to ban the
49:03
use of Wi-Fi in schools and we place
49:05
them with wired Network the four top
49:08
diseases that kills our children our
49:10
young adults right now are brain tumors
49:13
thyroid cancer testis cancer rectal
49:15
cancer everywhere we put our cell phones
49:17
and a lot of our children are sick and
49:20
they've been misdiagnosed and mistreated
49:22
because the wireless industry has put
49:24
billions and billions of dollars in the
49:27
past 30 years to mislead the public as
49:29
to the health effects and keep the
49:31
public uninformed we are performing an
49:33
experiment on children we are exposing
49:36
children to microwave radiation for six
49:40
hours during every school day we have
49:42
had absolutely no studies looking at the
49:44
long-term effects of this
49:45
radiation on young people or even on
49:49
adults a considerable amount of research
49:52
shows that developing brains and bodies
49:54
of children are much more affected than
49:56
adults and there are clear indications
49:58
of a link between increased
50:00
electromagnetic fields and autism
50:02
spectrum disorders we took ten artistic
50:06
children and went back to the sleeping
50:09
location where the mother was when she
50:12
was pregnant with that child
50:13
and compared it with the sleeping
50:17
location of a mother that gave birth to
50:20
healthy children we have ten mothers in
50:22
that group ten mothers in this group and
50:24
in the group of the autistic children we
50:27
found that the measurements have you got
50:30
for the microwave exposure was elevated
50:34
compared to the group of children that
50:36
were normal the fetus is affected the
50:40
exposure to men made electromagnetic
50:43
fields has become the first factor that
50:46
could be isolated ever in autism that
50:48
could predict autism the fifth
50:52
generation of wireless technology or 5g
50:55
as it's being rolled out worldwide
50:58
without safety testing let me say that
51:01
again without safety testing and how
51:03
we've got scientists and doctors and
51:05
environmental organizers saying stop
51:08
this because in terms of the effects of
51:11
wireless radiation the science is in
51:12
wireless radiation can lead to cancer as
51:16
heart tumors brain tumors DNA damage
51:19
wireless radiation is linked to
51:21
infertility to autism Alzheimer's and
51:24
more and guess what all the effects that
51:26
I just listed those are some of the
51:28
effects that are known according to the
51:30
technology that's being seen today first
51:33
of all you have to know that we know
51:34
that the other EMFs that we're exposed
51:37
to are already known to be health risks
51:40
and and basically that 5g because of the
51:45
frequency that's going to be used and
51:47
because of the extraordinarily high
51:50
pulsation levels that will be used is a
51:55
much bigger threat to our health than
51:58
the things that we
51:59
already have which are very substantial
52:01
threats to our health we're not just
52:03
talking about the intensity we're
52:06
talking about the frequency and the very
52:08
high level of pulsations there's a huge
52:11
literature which shows that pulsed EMF
52:14
CMS that pulse up and down very rapidly
52:16
are in most cases much more biologically
52:20
active than our non pulsed EMFs every
52:22
single wireless communication device
52:24
communicates via pulsations but the
52:26
industry completely ignores this issue
52:28
the problem with 5g is that they're
52:31
planning to put out tens of millions of
52:33
these antennae all over the place
52:34
without doing one single biological
52:36
safety test are you implying possibly
52:39
that we the consumers are the guinea pig
52:42
since they haven't really done tests to
52:43
see the effects in a smaller setting I
52:45
mean that's not an implication it's a
52:48
statement we are yes cancer is not the
52:51
main concern that I have I'm really
52:54
concerned about sperm count and about
52:56
effects on pregnancy how many of know
52:58
that one in six American couples is
53:01
unable to have a child when they want to
53:03
how many of you know that last year the
53:06
birth rate in this country dropped the
53:09
most that it ever has in recent history
53:12
3% in a single year people look at the
53:16
sperm
53:16
do you cell phones and the sperm you
53:20
should sperm swim and they swim straight
53:23
but if you expose them to really
53:26
frequency lower phone waves a swimming
53:29
circle
53:33
studies have been done here in Australia
53:35
taking sperm from healthy men and one
53:38
test tube gets exposed to cell phone
53:40
radiation and one test tube is not
53:42
exposed to mobile phone radiation and
53:44
then the results are evaluated and this
53:48
is a measure of vitality we measure how
53:51
well the sperm swim this is a measure of
53:53
mobility motility this is a measure of
53:55
the mitochondrial DNA damage they have
53:58
three times as much damage on their DNA
54:01
if they have been exposed to mobile
54:04
phone radiation the data on that are
54:06
rock solid cell phones can damage sperm
54:10
quantity and quality your embryo your
54:15
uterus in the fetus where your child is
54:19
developing for the first 100 days in the
54:23
ovaries the eggs do not have that
54:27
protection so they are at maximum risk
54:30
from radiation and for the first month
54:35
or so you wouldn't even know you were
54:38
pregnant you wouldn't even be taking
54:40
precautions that is the main danger area
54:44
so you give birth to a daughter but her
54:51
ovaries are now contaminated she may be
54:54
normal
54:55
she may be genetically damaged but her
54:59
ovaries are at the most risk so when
55:03
your daughter grows up and she becomes
55:07
pregnant and has a baby this is where
55:10
one of these eggs will be fertilized and
55:13
come out so the real damage here is your
55:17
grandchildren that is where it is going
55:19
to show most do you think that there is
55:24
a chance not in the third generation but
55:32
in the fifth generation and that would
55:34
for humans be something in the order 150
55:37
years ahead of us and of course then
55:39
it's too late to say that you are sorry
55:41
and it's very too late to say stop there
55:44
is a wealth of papers I mean we're
55:46
talking about
55:46
thousands of published papers in the
55:49
scientific literature fuel which show
55:52
sometimes none of which have entered the
55:54
official documentation from authorities
55:57
and likewise so I think it's really time
56:00
to have an independent compilation of
56:03
data such was done at August 31st 2007
56:08
in the form of the bio initiative report
56:11
of which I was one of the authors and
56:13
then we put together approximately 2000
56:16
scientific references on a little bit
56:18
more than 600 pages clearly saying that
56:21
if you for instance if you are a rat or
56:24
a mouse or a cell or a molecule you
56:26
should definitely not allow yourself to
56:28
be exposed to this and in the meantime
56:30
we have this full-scale experiment using
56:33
our own kids one interesting case John
56:37
Patterson is a telecommunications
56:40
engineer in Sydney Australia very
56:43
brilliant man for 20 years John Chester
56:46
Telstra digital systems over the time he
56:49
realized the dangers of electromagnetic
56:51
radiation it disrupts the boil the trick
56:54
system of your body which is really your
56:56
brain your nervous system how your
56:59
muscles talk and he tried warning of
57:01
these effects through different agencies
57:03
through his company go to Lotus Garrett
57:05
and measured it and drew up a report and
57:08
always he mediately removed from service
57:11
finally in 2007 he took matters into his
57:15
own hand he commandeered a used British
57:18
army tank and went and destroyed six
57:20
cellphone towers in Sydney Australia
57:22
because he wanted to stop this he was
57:24
trying to make a point the message was
57:27
that Helldiver suppose
57:29
you know these people were elected by us
57:31
to manage our infrastructure in a
57:33
responsible manner that is the sole
57:34
purpose of government if it's going to
57:36
exist at all and if it doesn't do that
57:37
then it has no right it is invalid so we
57:40
need to pull this infrastructure down we
57:41
really do but in order to do that I mean
57:43
we can't just be some violent domestic
57:45
terrorists you've got to you've got to
57:47
bring this awareness to the people that
57:49
these towers are doing them damage you
57:50
don't need bandwidth that fast and
57:53
they're not doing it so you can download
57:54
movies quickly they're doing it so they
57:56
can track every single thing you do and
57:58
bring in this social accrediting system
58:00
to control even everything you think the
58:06
story about a lady called Claire Edward
58:07
she was a United Nation staff member and
58:09
she was warning of the potentially
58:11
catastrophic dangers of 5g technology I
58:16
took issue four took the issue to the UN
58:20
secretary-general Antonio Guterres he is
58:24
a physicist and electrical engineer and
58:28
lectured on telecommunication signals
58:30
early in his career yet asserted to me
58:32
that he knew nothing about the dangers
58:35
of 5g
58:36
current public exposure levels are at
58:39
least one quintillion that's 18 zeros
58:43
one quintillion times above natural
58:46
background radiation according to
58:48
Professor Olle Johansson of the
58:50
Karolinska Institute in Sweden the
58:52
highly dangerous biological effects of
58:54
EMFs have been documented by thousands
58:57
of studies since 1932 indicating that we
59:01
may be facing a global health
59:02
catastrophe orders of magnitude worse
59:05
than those caused by tobacco and
59:07
cigarettes 5g is designed to deliver
59:10
concentrated and focused electromagnetic
59:13
radiation in excess of 100 times current
59:17
levels in the same way as do directed
59:20
energy weapons there is currently an
59:23
international appeal signed by 237 EMF
59:27
scientists from 41 nations urging the UN
59:30
and particularly the w-h-o to exert
59:33
strong leadership in fostering the
59:35
development of more protective EMF
59:37
guidelines encouraging precautionary
59:40
measures
59:41
and educating the public about the
59:43
considerable health risks particularly
59:45
the risks to children and fatal fetal
59:48
development sorry because on these
59:53
things we're talking to the Wi-Fi
59:55
systems I'm worried because I put those
59:58
devices in my house I this I will have
60:03
to I mean I might confess my ignorance
60:04
on this we will have to i-i've but I'm
60:08
going to raise this with the red show
60:10
which i think is the organization that
60:11
might be able to deal with it properly
60:13
because I must confess I was not aware
60:16
of that danger in 1996 when the
60:26
Telecommunications Act was passed in it
60:30
was a provision essentially they kept
60:32
local officials from addressing health
60:34
issued concerns when approving or not
60:37
approving a cell tower so been correct
60:40
but then something new who is happening
60:42
we've talked a lot about it on the
60:44
Silurian report thanks Jason Boggs Smith
60:46
and his website EMF warriors but but
60:49
this is new this is very very new so
60:51
you're you're basically you know sending
60:54
out an appeal on something that in one
60:56
sense hasn't happened yet this is not
60:58
just an incremental change this is a big
61:00
step up it's it's a sea change you and
61:04
onslaught it's not an improper word it's
61:05
a it's a bombardment so instead of a
61:08
cell tower one mile or two miles from
61:10
you and you still have cell phone
61:11
service we're gonna have antennas every
61:14
block and some pourcel it's going to
61:16
have one mounted two utility utility
61:18
pole maybe less than 20 meters from
61:20
their home so this kind of you know
61:24
invasive bombardment with this many
61:26
antennas I mean just in one square mile
61:28
if you do the math one per block and 16
61:31
blocks per mile that's about 250
61:32
antennas per square mile the millimeter
61:34
wave is untested former FCC Chairman Tom
61:37
wheeler openly said that they don't plan
61:39
to test we won't wait for the standards
61:42
and then our appeal also addresses the
61:44
fact that there's a plan to roll out 5g
61:46
through satellites in low Earth orbit so
61:49
20,000 satellites which will cover every
61:52
square foot of the planet with a 5 jisuk
62:02
night after night politicians and other
62:05
leaders were telling Americans that
62:07
Sputnik revealed that we were at great
62:10
risk completely new area well I think
62:24
the consequences are fairly plan
62:26
probable Soviet world domination we
62:30
choose to go to the moon in this decade
62:33
and do the other things not because they
62:36
are easy but because they are hard
62:38
because that challenge is one that we
62:41
are willing to accept one we are
62:43
unwilling to postpone and one we intend
62:46
to win welcome everybody to the White
62:53
House this is a White House 5g summit my
62:57
name is Justin Clark I'm the director of
62:58
public liaison and we are thrilled to
63:00
have you here today really happy to be
63:02
joined by a lot of leaders and Industry
63:03
members of Congress and the Senate White
63:07
House leaders on this and people from
63:09
the FCC before we start one we are
63:13
government so don't assume we know
63:15
anything okay I do agree I don't know
63:18
anything I have become accustomed to
63:20
giving speeches in my new position on
63:23
subjects about which I frankly know very
63:25
little and we need more cell towers and
63:28
connections in Connecticut Wednesday's
63:29
ridiculous
63:30
the u.s. is in the lead thanks to our
63:32
private sector as well as the work of
63:34
the FCC and this administration overall
63:37
China and South Korea and many other
63:39
countries are eager to claim this mantle
63:42
we have every intention to deploy 5g
63:45
first and reap the benefits of faster
63:47
and more robust wireless yes I hope we'd
63:50
be China of course and get to Giga Giga
63:52
gigabit speeds and low latency and the
63:55
race has begun let there be no mistake
63:58
the race to 5g is a sprint winning the
64:01
global race to 5g it's a national
64:03
priority we must bear in mind the
64:05
national security implications of
64:06
winning
64:07
the race on 5g today we're talking about
64:09
the importance of being first in 5g
64:12
continued commitment to putting America
64:14
first in the race to 5g we're calling it
64:16
America first 5g first well our strategy
64:19
is called the 5g fast plan a plan to
64:23
facilitate America's superiority in 5g
64:26
technology connected devices for health
64:28
applications which I love has the
64:31
capacity to make people healthier as I
64:33
understand it a lot of medical
64:34
applications industry is not asking the
64:37
government for money to build 5g
64:38
networks they're asking us to cut the
64:40
red tape that surrounds infrastructure
64:42
deployment we cannot let today's red
64:45
tape strangle the 5g future the red tape
64:47
slows and sometimes stops the building
64:49
of densified Network facilities
64:51
necessary for 5g as we continue our
64:54
efforts to keep government out of the
64:55
way
64:56
so that America can continue its
64:58
leadership for America to win the race
64:59
to Phi Z one path is the government
65:02
regulatory path the other path is the
65:05
private enterprise free market the Ailes
65:08
of creative destruction Schumpeter path
65:11
they never heard that the house of
65:13
construction
65:14
it just means let it rip the new
65:17
replaces the old with 5g we're on the
65:20
cusp of another era of American
65:22
innovation it means an even more
65:23
connected world for everyone around us
65:25
unlocking the potential of the Internet
65:28
of Things to become safer healthier and
65:30
more sustainable for our future you know
65:32
sometimes look we all believe in the
65:34
10th amendment but sometimes you have to
65:35
override
65:44
by the way the 1996 bill permits that
65:48
kind of override we're not here to be
65:51
completely heavy-handed but sometimes
65:53
you got to do what you got to do in some
65:55
of these states cities that don't want
65:57
to cooperate want to shake us down we
65:59
can't allow obstacles and barriers to
66:01
stop this movement that's all and this
66:08
happened in Canada I mean there were
66:10
some activists I was working with up
66:12
there that said well you know we went
66:14
over victory we got the look of the
66:16
Public Utilities Commission to allow us
66:17
opt out and I said boy you let's divide
66:19
and conquer they just got rid of the the
66:22
people that were raising hell so you
66:25
know that's not it that's not the answer
66:26
we need to opt out everybody an opt-out
66:29
is an agreement to pay to not be harmed
66:32
an opt-out is volunteering in to
66:34
extortion an opt-out says that if I
66:36
don't pay you you have the right to harm
66:39
me so that that doesn't work this is a
66:41
mandate this is being pushed down your
66:43
throat by a company that it's not
66:46
responsive by a government that is not
66:48
responsible and it's being done in a
66:50
collusion that's designed to undermine
66:52
the individual rights of individual
66:54
people in communities across the country
66:56
and around the world the Minister for
66:59
the environment has a duty is duty is
67:02
primarily to ensure that there is
67:04
cleaner better healthier environment for
67:08
people in this country it's a simple
67:10
duty it all says responsibility in
67:12
regard to science and innovation to make
67:14
sure that that happens what seems to be
67:17
happening here in fact one could say
67:19
undoubtedly happening here is he's using
67:22
science and innovation to ensure that
67:24
our right to life is threatened
67:26
there have been no public debates there
67:29
is no public discourse there are no
67:32
public disclosures as to why when how
67:35
what is going on in regard to 5g that by
67:40
itself is a breach of ministerial
67:43
responsibility and one which we really
67:46
should look at in terms of a private
67:48
prosecution against the ministers who
67:50
have failed to protect our right to lie
67:56
okay smart smart technology smart meters
68:00
smart cars not that smart huh
68:03
what a smart mean anything that has
68:05
small attached to it
68:07
secret militarized armaments in
68:09
residential technology that's where
68:12
smart came from and smart every bit of
68:15
technology that you see today has all
68:18
all being developed for the some type
68:21
the battlefield some type of
68:22
intelligence government system and
68:24
obviously these developments have to be
68:26
commercialized and people have actually
68:28
took them into the homes the definition
68:33
of a smart grid is a wireless system
68:35
that will fundamentally turn every
68:39
single appliance in your home into the
68:41
equivalent of a transmitting cell phone
68:44
that's every every computer every
68:46
television every furnace every air
68:48
conditioner every coffee machine every
68:50
printer every single appliance that you
68:52
have in your house will eventually in a
68:55
smart grid have an antenna that's
68:56
embedded into it that will transmit your
68:59
usage data to a smart meter on the
69:02
outside of your home that will then
69:04
transmit your usage data to another
69:07
tower receiving a usage signal that will
69:10
then go to the utility company for
69:12
supposedly billing purposes not all
69:14
signals will just be about your
69:16
individual use
69:18
there will be aggregated will bounce
69:20
signal from house to house to house
69:22
within a neighborhood that will then
69:24
accumulate all of the usage data that
69:27
will transmit that to the utility
69:28
company now what that will do is that
69:30
the end metering system that is
69:32
transmitting all of that data will be
69:34
firing an RF signal at many many times a
69:37
second which will increase the average
69:40
homeowners radio frequency radiation
69:42
exposure exponentially this picture
69:46
shows some aphids on the leaf of an
69:48
orange tree
69:49
shortly after radar equipment was
69:51
installed at a nearby airport a number
69:54
of years ago I noticed that every few
69:57
seconds all the aphids were tense up in
70:00
unison and do sort of a little dance as
70:02
you see in the picture upon further
70:05
investigation I found that the interval
70:08
of time between the activity of each
70:10
dance coincided exactly with the
70:13
rotation of the radar rotor device at
70:16
the airport which was a distance of
70:19
approximately 14 miles the antenna
70:22
arrays create this steerable beam which
70:25
helps concentrate the energy the beams
70:28
get pointed at the user what's a MIMO
70:33
tank mussaf in Mass Effect British
70:35
government have got a planet on four
70:36
hundred thousand oh this is so that
70:38
you've got 5g in every nook and cranny
70:40
every part of the country sites for that
70:43
you can have autonomous tractors believe
70:45
it or not
70:45
however those transmitters these are
70:48
real or it is fierce to really adore the
70:52
Orion or signal sweeping the countryside
70:54
will kill every pollinator
70:56
every biological structure it will
70:59
sterilize livestock it will kill the
71:01
ground so consequently
71:04
Lant want to have a value obviously
71:07
farmers will die the community will be
71:11
under attack the community will be under
71:15
a ton if we can't produce food if we
71:17
kill all the pollinators
71:18
we're in serious trouble the takeaway is
71:22
that 5g the trillion dollar roll out of
71:26
5g by our friendly local government is
71:29
definitely a weapon system masquerading
71:32
as a modern efficiency technology it
71:35
will certainly is and what I'll put it
71:37
down it's economic terrorism there is no
71:40
value
71:41
nil in killing ophea population and
71:45
destroying your ability to grow food to
71:48
kill all your pala nearness that may
71:50
have a nice financial number on a piece
71:53
of paper but in reality
71:55
dementia diabetes all the things that
71:59
are currently crippling nehs a burden on
72:02
the country illness mental health issues
72:05
the the the focus of that calls can be
72:09
identified and has
72:11
the fight in the science the science is
72:14
proven the epidemiological data that was
72:17
seen on the street is now substantiate
72:20
not science the DNA inside you the
72:24
mitochondrial DNA you can trace
72:27
unchanged to your mother her mother her
72:31
mother right the way back to the
72:34
beginning of the human race in Africa
72:37
the Stone Age
72:38
it is unchanged the multiple and that is
72:42
being unchanged in your children which
72:45
means if you damage it your child could
72:48
be genetically damaged then her child
72:51
and her child and her child forever you
72:56
are condemning the future generations of
73:00
every single child there is a way of our
73:07
air and light at the end of the tunnel
73:10
or there is a summer ray of hope thanks
73:13
to the principles of biological quantum
73:16
entanglement that we have learned how to
73:19
exploit in the field of biology medicine
73:21
now we can transfer the information from
73:25
the microbial DNA to the human DNA and
73:28
in so doing we can train so to speak the
73:32
microbes to withstand whatever extreme
73:35
condition they're exposed to including
73:38
this new technology and then we can
73:40
train them to transfer these resilience
73:43
of theirs to our DNA so let's say that
73:47
there are good reasons to be worried
73:50
about the introduction of these and new
73:53
technologies but fortunately since the
73:56
knowledge in the field of quantum
73:57
biology in the field of micro or micro
74:00
biomedicine is advancing as fast as
74:03
potentially harmful technology then we
74:06
can exploit this knowledge to protect
74:09
ourselves from any real potential or
74:14
perceive the danger from these new
74:16
technologies
74:18
I've met with molecular and cellular
74:21
biologist swith blood microscopists with
74:25
weapons development experts frontline
74:29
activists and researchers and all the
74:32
stories I'm hearing from these experts
74:34
and pundits leads to the same thing 5g
74:37
is almost certainly the endgame it is an
74:41
extinction event brought into our homes
74:44
into our classrooms onto the high street
74:47
into the very cells and DNA in our human
74:51
bodies it is such a perilous threat that
74:55
it is almost impossible to imagine let
74:59
alone describe when the 5g signature
75:02
goes live it will tap into a multitude
75:06
of satellites which are in GSF orbit
75:09
around the surface of the earth millions
75:12
of surface antennas will pick up that
75:15
signalling and will then scatter the
75:18
signaling into hundreds and hundreds of
75:21
millions of different micro antenna
75:23
systems and set up on street lamps and
75:26
even in your home which you're not aware
75:29
of incidentally the LED light bulbs in
75:32
your home invariably contain the micro
75:35
or nano tech lens flare capacitors which
75:38
will receive the 5g signaling and it
75:42
will proliferate the 5g signaling
75:44
everywhere by exploding the signal into
75:48
billions of photons which will target
75:51
everything all at the same time this is
75:54
stealth technology
75:55
this is invisible science but what it
75:59
means in simple terms is that you will
76:01
be flagged up visible trackable inside
76:05
your own
76:05
home anywhere you move on the surface of
76:08
the earth they will have a lock and load
76:10
tracking capability over you you will be
76:12
visible to invisible masters each one of
76:16
us all the time today our governments
76:20
and the corporate sector have managed
76:22
somehow to infiltrate the mainframe of
76:26
our civilization and are pushing through
76:28
a 20 trillion dollar infrastructural
76:31
rollout without any and I mean without
76:34
any health science running behind it
76:37
there have been no tests your government
76:40
and your health authorities are either
76:42
in collusion on this matter of genocide
76:45
and ecocide or they're just m stupid and
76:49
I would suggest as the latter
76:54
shame on the technologists and the
76:58
electricians who are furthering this
77:01
technology in our homes in our offices
77:03
in our streets
77:04
shame on the legislators and the
77:07
parliamentarians of the troglodytes and
77:09
bureaucrats that proliferate our society
77:12
today
77:13
shame on that a Shillong for putting
77:15
their signatures or two contracts which
77:18
allow the fast-tracking of this
77:20
technology into our homes not to our
77:22
high streets
77:22
shame on the parliamentarians and
77:25
international leadership whose wedding
77:27
signatures and seals of office are
77:29
sanctioning and permissioning the
77:32
rollout of something which is arguably
77:34
the greatest threat to humankind
77:36
shame on each one of us who now fail to
77:40
get up out of our homes walk out of our
77:42
front doors and challenge every
77:44
so-called authority who dares to violate
77:47
our bodies our homes and our future
77:49
generations
No comments:
Post a Comment